I’mJustSayin’ wrote:I know this is an older topic, but I just ran across it. As an older couple, a sex swing is a game changer. (Me 72, her 70.)
I have some chronic back pain, she has some hip and knee pain. We had “test driven” several sex slings and swings at a resort that has adult playrooms. Didn’t really care for the slings, but we started looking at swings online. I considered building one, but we found one that we liked. It’s a “Private Euphoria” model from Lonesome Dragon. At the time we bought it, they didn’t have a U.S. distributor. Had to be shipped from Switzerland and pass through US Customs. Easy to install in the basement with exposed floor trusses above. It was great during the “trimix years”. (Until trimix brought the onset of peyronies.) So I’m really looking forward to getting back to that swing more often after implant. Although we still enjoy using it for oral. I have a chair that is just the right height to allow me to enjoy my favorite meal for as long as we want; with no physical strain on either of us.
It's understandable that men want to restore function in sex and I think it is fantastic what you have achieved against physiological decline, however I was wondering whether focusing more on the objective (of sexual satisfaction for both partners) and less on traditional methods of achieving that, might achieve those objectives more easily and more frequently, with less potential side effects.
I notice your development of the use of vibrators to assist your wife in her orgasm, so I was wondering whether something similar for you might assist in your independent orgasm more easily than with swings and implants. I was reading recently that vibration techniques can help men achieve orgasm, even when they experience erectile difficulty; then there are other techniques such as prostate stimulation that can achieve multiple orgasms without any involvement of the penis at all.
I'm interested in mens viewpoints around how important it is to have traditional sex with original equipment, versus potentially more easily achieving sexual satisfaction via other tools and techniques. How much do the benefits of "natural" sex outweigh ease of achieving sexual satisfaction (and perhaps greater or more frequent sexual satisfaction) via other means?