Venous leak - Insufficiency arterial

Anything goes when it comes to ED.
heisenberg23
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:46 am

Venous leak - Insufficiency arterial

Postby heisenberg23 » Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:31 pm

Man, 39 with insufficiency arterial for many years.
Blood tests are all ok!
Pills not work. I never try injections.
I'm thinkink on inflatable implant.

Any advice that might help?



PENIAL ECO-DOPPLER
Technique: An ultrasound study was carried out with a 10 MHz multi-frequency probe. A Triplex morphological and hemodynamic study was performed after intracavernous injection of 10 mg of PGE1.

Morphological Study:
The cavernous bodies have normal morphology and ecostructure, with no signs of calcifications or fibrosis zones.
Cavernous arteries with a linear course, normal caliber and without morphological alterations.

Hemodynamic Study:
Early phase (5 min):
Normal velocities were observed in both cavernous arteries with low resistance flow characteristic of this induction phase.

The speeds obtained were as follows:


R L
Maximum speed - 35cm (m/s) 35cm (m/s)
Minimum speed - 13cm (m/s) 15cm (m/s)
Late phase (15m):

A satisfactory erection was achieved at an angle of less than 90° to the abdominal wall. The velocities obtained in both cavernous arteries are within
Normal limits. However, positive diastolic velocities that are not characteristic of this phase continue to be observed. There was also a flow in the dorsal
Vein of the penis with a persistent character and with increased speeds (20cm/sec).

The speeds obtained were as follows:

R L
Maximum speed - 42cm (m/s) 55cm (m/s)
Minimum speed - 5.1cm (m/s) 3.7cm (m/s)

Conclusions:
The morphological study did not reveal alterations worthy of reference in the corpora cavernosa, namely areas of fibrosis or defined calcifications.
In the Doppler study, no signs of arterial insufficiency were observed.
However, there was persistent flow in the dorsal vein of the penis and positive diastolic velocities of the cavernous arteries in the late phase, aspects
Compatible with some degree of venous/occlusive incompetence to be valued according to the patient’s clinical data.

1380anthony
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2022 11:29 am

Re: Venous leak - Insufficiency arterial

Postby 1380anthony » Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:54 am

Most men have VL and it's sucks. Apparently it has no cure and the only option is implant.

sogwap
Posts: 457
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Venous leak - Insufficiency arterial

Postby sogwap » Wed Mar 20, 2024 10:15 pm

The report says the injection caused a satisfactory erection.
It also said, "In the Doppler study, no signs of arterial insufficiency were observed."

Did you ask the doctor/urologist if penile injections (trimix) would give you erections suitable for intercourse?
Age: 68. Struggled with ED/PE for years.
Used Viagra for 10+ years with mixed success.
In May 2022 started using Trimix with very good results.
Feb 2023 developed PD
2023 still in treatment for PD, and still using Trimix with very good results

Rider1400
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:23 pm
Location: Benton Arkansas

Re: Venous leak - Insufficiency arterial

Postby Rider1400 » Sat Mar 23, 2024 2:40 pm

In all the years of reading here and studying info out there I’ve never heard of VL getting better. It always gets worse and for some like me it was a slow progress for the first 10 years then seemed to progress. As it gets to a certain point the pills just can’t keep up and I was gradually gettti where they were totally unreliable. Same with injections for me I doubled dose every month or so and Dr ecologist opinion was my VL had progressed rapidly at this point. For me it was absolutely time for an implant! No regrets at all. Been some of the best sexual times this last 22 months!!
59 years old ED started mid 40s pills failed after 10 years. Injections works but diminishing results with pain. Implanted 5-22 Baylor,Scott,and White Dallas.Dr Michael Wierschem, infrapubic Coloplast 20cm and 1cm RTE. Going strong and loving it!


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests