reality of ED

[Bubba1956]

Frank talk has been under scrutiny lately over various issues. The basic knowledge should be we ALL had broke dicks. Some have had surgery , others are dealing with injections, VED etc. It doesn't matter the choice of treatment but, the bottom line we all experienced the broke dick syndrome.

[Happy Toy]

We are here to help each other!

[Preacher1957]

Well said!!

[bldoink]

Oops!

[navy6587]

Agree...I heartily thank the originators because, otherwise, I would have been unable to find ANY other website that has as much information, anecdotal evidence, compassion and camaraderie among like-affected individuals no matter how/ why the affliction hit us. And, at the risk of sounding sexist, I am glad that women (yes, even our wives/ partners who support us 100%) are not permitted to post. Read...OK...but no comments.

[Lost Sheep]

Still here? I wonder if all the new spammers are coming from the same spam outfit?

I wonder if georgewhittington is actually a spammer. Clearly he does suggest oral treatments, but of his 5 posts (as of early on 3/22/19) only one has a link to another web location. On the contrary, his posts appear to be sincere efforts to be sympathetic, helpful and moderately informative. No more so than many other members' posts.

If you think he is a spammer, a PM conversation with him should be definitive. Let's not jump to conclusions, please. Accusations without evidence can have a chilling effect on all members.

On the other hand, your observation on paulgonzales86's post in another thread here suggests that spammers (if, indeed, goergewhittington and paulgonzales86 are spammers) are becoming more sly. I just cannot tell to a high degree of certainty if these guys (or person/organization, singular) are sincere or not.

Time will tell.

[dtwarren1942]

Where’s Larry? The Kmagra link needs to be deleted.

[bldoink]

Oops again!

[Lost Sheep]

The sneaky ones will make several innocuous posts to try to establish some minimal amount of credibility before they start dropping links to their desired target. Yes, I can be wrong and have been before. However, this poster passed my own spam test threshold and the problem does seem to be increasing. If I'm wrong, well I'm sorry. I don't think I am. I hate to see people get sucked into some spam target. No, I don't care to PM him, but you can. The Moderator or Admin can slap me if they want to. I don't take offence easily. There are others that I'm confident are spammers but there's still a flicker of doubt. And a probable brand new one too. You can usually tell when a new spammer is warming up and trying to establish a little cred before the official spamming starts. No I'm not a moderator and it's probably not my business.

I agree with ALL that you posted.

I was unaware that you have a more sophisticated screening process. Good on you and thanks.

I wonder if we (as a community) can set up a protocol for notifying Paul (site owner) and Larry10265 (moderator) to efficiently police spammers without falsely identifying accidental (perhaps overenthusiastic) supporters of products or methodologies that helped them?

Sincerely,

Lost Sheep

[Frank Talk Admin]

Easy guys. He's not a spammer.
Things are under control.