FrankTalk.org

As in the title, is this procedure invasive and can leave some negative outcome?

I may have Venous Leak(read my signature)but recently i noticed really good improvements in my erections for sex. Without pde5.

I’m worried if cavernosography can make me left with some negative outcome or injury. I heard I think mixed opinions but i’m not sure.

I also tried PDE5 recently but i noticed i only get erection faster and stronger from arousal kissing, it reach its maximum then fades away gradually same as without pde5 supplements.

Every answer from those who undergo cavernosography in the past will be appreciated!!!

anyone? come on i believe a lot of you had this test done

s7utty wrote:anyone? come on i believe a lot of you had this test done

Nope. I never read of much success coming from knowing the cause of ED.
The meds I take are needed to keep me alive.
Tried the oral pills till they quit working.
Had a family member that went to a mens clinic that heavily advertises some wave therapy. He had bad premature ejaculation & they put him on pills. Pills that had already failed me.
All roads lead to an implant so I got an implant. I should of quit messing with the other treatments 10 years earlier. Would of saved me a lot of grief.
I reccomend implants to most men with ED. Studies show that 97% of them won't get an implant.
I've seen your posts for quite awhile. I'm afraid that you might be in the 97% group.
Sorry for being harsh.

Gt1956 wrote:

s7utty wrote:anyone? come on i believe a lot of you had this test done

Nope. I never read of much success coming from knowing the cause of ED.
The meds I take are needed to keep me alive.
Tried the oral pills till they quit working.
Had a family member that went to a mens clinic that heavily advertises some wave therapy. He had bad premature ejaculation & they put him on pills. Pills that had already failed me.
All roads lead to an implant so I got an implant. I should of quit messing with the other treatments 10 years earlier. Would of saved me a lot of grief.
I reccomend implants to most men with ED. Studies show that 97% of them won't get an implant.
I've seen your posts for quite awhile. I'm afraid that you might be in the 97% group.
Sorry for being harsh.

Man I asked if Ct cavernosography can have negative impact and make already not good penis more dead. I know my english suck balls but i thought its clear to read haha sorry bro. All I wanted to know is if cavernosogram can make things worse as some people said that however havent cound any studies about that!

Btw about implants yes ur right. Most men wont decide for them. I in september travel for 3 exams in Paris. I respond to Viagra still. After exams if my venous leak is confirmed im gonna pop as many viagras as I can till it stop work. The day it stop work, next day im signing for implant. I dont wantto b in that 97% ! I want to have my dick!

cheers

Typically, CAT scans are non-invasive. For a penile test they will inject you with a vasoactive agent. They'll have you sit for a few to see if you get an erection. Then the nurse will smear a glob of ultrasound gel on your dick, run the wand up and down while taking readings for the doc to decipher.

Old Guy wrote:Typically, CAT scans are non-invasive. For a penile test they will inject you with a vasoactive agent. They'll have you sit for a few to see if you get an erection. Then the nurse will smear a glob of ultrasound gel on your dick, run the wand up and down while taking readings for the doc to decipher.

Thank you for detailed answer.
Lets see if some other folks have something to add.
I'd be grateful to hear some words from people who actually undergo this procedure (cavernosography).
Have a good day everyone!
KR

In my opinion, not all roads lead to an implant. It is simply the most profitable option for all doctors/hospitals. Pills have a temporary effect, injections have a temporary effect, scleropathy has a temporary effect, and the IMPLANT has a temporary effect. Each thing lasts for several years and must be replaced by something else. There are people in the forum who did a revision after a few months?!?! Others in a year?!?! Others after 5 years. If a less invasive procedure can give 1-3 years of good sex life why should it be an implant? Even 5 months?! Why not try that first instead of destroying his penis and having it be temporary again? Because you misunderstand that the implant is a permanent solution. NO, this is a FINAL decision and not permanent. Each revision is a new decision and a new trauma to the body. And no one knows exactly when his turn will come for this new revision. So there is NO permanent solution to ED.