Hearing and Sex
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:52 pm
Hearing and Sex
I am trying to decide whether or not to go ahead with surgery and came up with this analogy. Comments please.
I could go on as I am with difficulty hearing conversations in restaurants and other noisy venues and occasionally having to ask people to repeat themselves even in quiet conversations. I lose the high notes in concerts and am often unable to distinguish song lyrics. All this is moderately frustrating - livable but far from ideal.
I could go on as I am, with partial and short-lived erections sufficient for my own orgasms, but not for my partner's. This is moderately satisfactory to us both, but the joy and intimacy of joining our bodies in this way (as opposed to the modified sex we can have now) is moderately frustrating - livable but far from ideal.
Afflicted with marginal Hearing loss correctible to perfect hearing by an implant has a success rate of 80-90 percent success rate and a 10% rate of utter deafness. ( see my post script below)
Afflicted with marginal sexual performance correctible to perfect by an implant which has a success rate of 80-90 percent and a 10% rate of complete impotence.
Now, you use your hearing every day and all day, but otherwise, the comparison (to me, at first glance) seems apt. Are there disjoints in this analogy that might be improved by using a different function for comparison.
I am currently struggling with the decision of 1) continuing with pills and sex-of-other-kinds for the intimacy we enjoy or 2) taking the chance/opportunity of the benefits that implant surgery might provide.
Or waiting until the decision is forcibly made clearer.
Thoughts?
Lost Sheep
P.S. The hearing loss statistic and treatment is hypothetical and Imagined solely for comparison purposes.
I am trying to decide whether or not to go ahead with surgery and came up with this analogy. Comments please.
I could go on as I am with difficulty hearing conversations in restaurants and other noisy venues and occasionally having to ask people to repeat themselves even in quiet conversations. I lose the high notes in concerts and am often unable to distinguish song lyrics. All this is moderately frustrating - livable but far from ideal.
I could go on as I am, with partial and short-lived erections sufficient for my own orgasms, but not for my partner's. This is moderately satisfactory to us both, but the joy and intimacy of joining our bodies in this way (as opposed to the modified sex we can have now) is moderately frustrating - livable but far from ideal.
Afflicted with marginal Hearing loss correctible to perfect hearing by an implant has a success rate of 80-90 percent success rate and a 10% rate of utter deafness. ( see my post script below)
Afflicted with marginal sexual performance correctible to perfect by an implant which has a success rate of 80-90 percent and a 10% rate of complete impotence.
Now, you use your hearing every day and all day, but otherwise, the comparison (to me, at first glance) seems apt. Are there disjoints in this analogy that might be improved by using a different function for comparison.
I am currently struggling with the decision of 1) continuing with pills and sex-of-other-kinds for the intimacy we enjoy or 2) taking the chance/opportunity of the benefits that implant surgery might provide.
Or waiting until the decision is forcibly made clearer.
Thoughts?
Lost Sheep
P.S. The hearing loss statistic and treatment is hypothetical and Imagined solely for comparison purposes.