Page 1 of 1

Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am
by sliphill
Ok, now that I know I have a venous leak, surprise surprise. This is why the trimix became more and more less effective. This new Uro did a doppler test to confirm this. She said to just use a band with the injection. She prescribed a lesser strength trimix which I could pick up today. But my old uro prescribed a rocket fuel quadmix 120/30/3/.3 which I could get overnighted from a florida. Of course the quadmix is twice the cost of the trimix which I can get locally. My question is do you think that the quadmix would work better being I have the leak? I'm thinking to hold off on the trimix, and just get the quadmix. Who knows, I might not need a constriction ring with the quadmix. I do have a pretty significant leak.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:14 am
by leesburg2013
well too me I would try the quad before I switch. May I ask how much the Florida compounding will cost?? I am looking to change since my local just cost me last week $190, almost exact formula you have.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:05 am
by sliphill
leesburg2013 wrote:well too me I would try the quad before I switch. May I ask how much the Florida compounding will cost?? I am looking to change since my local just cost me last week $190, almost exact formula you have.


The quadmix cost $120, but the overnight shipping cost is an additional $30. I think this is for a 5ml vial.

The trimix is a very mild 10/30/.5 mix and is $65.

Could get the trimix today, while I can't get the quadmix until next Tuesday. But I was thinking the same as you.

Oh well, guess I won't be fucking tonight.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:06 am
by sliphill
leesburg2013 wrote:well too me I would try the quad before I switch. May I ask how much the Florida compounding will cost?? I am looking to change since my local just cost me last week $190, almost exact formula you have.


I could give you the number if you want to try these guys out.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:02 pm
by rahod1
My question is do you think that the quadmix would work better being I have the leak? I'm thinking to hold off on the trimix, and just get the quadmix. Who knows, I might not need a constriction ring with the quadmix. I do have a pretty significant leak.

If you have a significant leak...a ring is the only thing that will help. It's like having a bathtub with no *plug* to hold back the water. I use an adjustable ring with no leak and it really helps firm things up. Quadmix won't help. Just my take.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:55 am
by tomas1
I just decided to give quad mix a try. The pharmacy is just a mile from home so no shipping is involved.
I did get mild sticker shock when the price was $230 for a 10ml vial.
I'll have to see how many shots I can get from that to see if it's cost effective.
I was using more and more tri-mix with diminishing results.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:15 pm
by leesburg2013
rahod1 wrote:
My question is do you think that the quadmix would work better being I have the leak? I'm thinking to hold off on the trimix, and just get the quadmix. Who knows, I might not need a constriction ring with the quadmix. I do have a pretty significant leak.

If you have a significant leak...a ring is the only thing that will help. It's like having a bathtub with no *plug* to hold back the water. I use an adjustable ring with no leak and it really helps firm things up. Quadmix won't help. Just my take.


so the ring you use do you just put it around penis or around balls also. I usually do latter.

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:06 pm
by sliphill
rahod1 wrote:
My question is do you think that the quadmix would work better being I have the leak? I'm thinking to hold off on the trimix, and just get the quadmix. Who knows, I might not need a constriction ring with the quadmix. I do have a pretty significant leak.

If you have a significant leak...a ring is the only thing that will help. It's like having a bathtub with no *plug* to hold back the water. I use an adjustable ring with no leak and it really helps firm things up. Quadmix won't help. Just my take.


I just got a medical grade adjustable one. I tried it out without injecting, because I won't get my quadmix until Tuesday. The one thing I didn't like is it pinched me when I pulled it tight. I also ordered this one which is similar to the medical grade one,

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01HK ... UTF8&psc=1

I also ordered one of these,

https://www.amazon.com/Medical-Technolo ... sion+rings

Re: Better off with quadmix?

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:22 pm
by sliphill
rahod1 wrote:
My question is do you think that the quadmix would work better being I have the leak? I'm thinking to hold off on the trimix, and just get the quadmix. Who knows, I might not need a constriction ring with the quadmix. I do have a pretty significant leak.

If you have a significant leak...a ring is the only thing that will help. It's like having a bathtub with no *plug* to hold back the water. I use an adjustable ring with no leak and it really helps firm things up. Quadmix won't help. Just my take.


Thanks for the feedback. I think my leak is significant. So the ring stops the leak then. Can I put it on like 5/10 mins after injecting? My guess is it should be fine, because the doctor said the bllod flow in was above average.