Page 1 of 1
Trimix injection vs Trimix gel
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2017 4:20 pm
by newbie1
anyone has comparative information of the two?
Re: Trimix injection vs Trimix gel
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:16 pm
by Cigar56
There is no worthwhile comparison. Trust me, if simply rubbing the penis with gel was as effective as injections, then none of us would be sticking needles into our dicks.
Re: Trimix injection vs Trimix gel
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:10 pm
by JimStars
newb,
I used Trimix Gel when it first came out 5 year ago. It worked pretty good -- much better than MUSE for instance -- no burning pellet feeling, but was very expensive -- about 25 dollars per stick. That is less than retail cost of MUSE but too expensive for regular use. It was splooshed in urethrally with a snub-nosed applcator so no needle.
What I really found helpful in those days was that you could dissolve the freeze-dried gel powder side into bacteriostatic water and make a TON of injectable (they had a 1500 mcg stick -- so that could make enough for 75 shots ... (for $25).
But the place went out of business.
Now other on-line pharmacies have picked up on offering it -- but I have stuck with the shots!
J