aussiePeyronies wrote:Can I ask why you guy went from AMS to Titan ?
Original implant was too short resulting in floppy glans. Revision surgeon recommended titan for girth purposes and I agreed.
Went from AMS to Titan
Re: Went from AMS to Titan
Original implant was too short resulting in floppy glans. Revision surgeon recommended titan for girth purposes and I agreed.
AMS 700 18cm +2 rte Feb 2022 (under sized)
Titan 20cm +2 rte Jul 2022
59 yo, married since 1985
Ed since 2009, pills, injections both worked until they didn't.
Titan 20cm +2 rte Jul 2022
59 yo, married since 1985
Ed since 2009, pills, injections both worked until they didn't.
-
FinallyBionic
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2022 8:12 am
Re: Went from AMS to Titan
cwatt1 wrote:I've seen several references to doctors choosing AMS or Titan depending on anatomy. I really don't know the reason for this as they are both similar products that come in a variety of sizes. Why would a certain brand be better for one's anatomy?
Titan is known to be more rigid than AMS. At lengths up to 21cm, both models work as their rigidity is very enough for what they are made for. However, for longer ones, ie 24cm and 26cm Titan is a perfect fit. These cylinder lengths need more stiff material. AMS CX has 24cm as a special order, and Titan has them as regular lengths. AMS LGX is recommended for 18cm length as they expand, and the patient can get more length with continuous cycling.
Finally Bionic
1969. RP Oct. 2017. Pills and Trimix didn't work. Inguinal hernia repair on both sides. AMS CX 21 cm+1 RTE, by Dr. Kai Li at Kaiser, VA, Jan. 2021. FT member since July 2020 as AST2123. See my previous 457 posts.
1969. RP Oct. 2017. Pills and Trimix didn't work. Inguinal hernia repair on both sides. AMS CX 21 cm+1 RTE, by Dr. Kai Li at Kaiser, VA, Jan. 2021. FT member since July 2020 as AST2123. See my previous 457 posts.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ballhog47, Budward, easymoney, Nebraska64 and 295 guests
