Single and implanted..question for you guys

[Captain1117]

Question for single-implanted guys
Do you think the implant gives you an advantage in the dating market?

The rationale and data behind my assumption are as follows:

Avegare PIV intercourse time globally is close to 6 minutes. With an implant and reasonable fitness, one can reach 45 or even 60 minutes of one or maybe split into 3/4 sessions lasting two hours.
The hardness and erection rigidity is of course a second benefit.

This should stand out to an average female who has experienced average other guys' performance. With the right amount of cocky humor and a sprinkle of 50 Shades style dominance in the bedroom and the power of implant unleashed should be a very potent mix.

Have single guys sensed this power especially compared to your pre-implant days of dating?
Did the girls comment about your lasting power and or erection hardness?

Thanks in advance for sharing your



From the survey:

The average therapists’ responses defined the ranges of intercourse activity times: "adequate," from three to seven minutes; "desirable," from seven to 13 minutes; "too short" from one to two minutes; and "too long" from 10 to 30 minutes.

https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story ... %20minutes.

[ThailandBound]

I'm single with a girlfriend 33 years younger than me.

I have at times fucked her in the ass for well over :45 minutes. More than once, over an hour. She loved every minute of it and has commented on how much she likes it that her boyfriend "has power" (the Thai girl term for ability to maintain an erection).

So, yeah. You should do well in the dating scene. Many, if not most, women are multi-orgasmic. Those intense 6 minutes of fucking you mention are enjoyable to them but there are plenty of women out there who silently accept that for them it's "game over" in terms of their pleasure when the guy cums, quits, and falls asleep. You are not that guy.

[Captain1117]

I'm single with a girlfriend 33 years younger than me.

I have at times fucked her in the ass for well over :45 minutes. More than once, over an hour. She loved every minute of it and has commented on how much she likes it that her boyfriend "has power" (the Thai girl term for ability to maintain an erection).

So, yeah. You should do well in the dating scene. Many, if not most, women are multi-orgasmic. Those intense 6 minutes of fucking you mention are enjoyable to them but there are plenty of women out there who silently accept that for them it's "game over" in terms of their pleasure when the guy cums, quits, and falls asleep. You are not that guy.

Thanks Thailandbound...I agree ..women accept that 6 or 10 minutes of PIV sex but when a man can blow their mind they will notice that.

[2435tjklAS]

Learning what women are sexually interested in and attracted based of its "data," is a completely terrible and unrealistic way to think of it. Sex is very personal and very private; you're not gonna learn how women like to get fucked by studying what they openly share publicly about it.

[Username1]

It’s all about flow and being in tune with the one you’re with.

The implant creates opportunities.

[2435tjklAS]

Learning what women are sexually interested in and attracted based of its "data," is a completely terrible and unrealistic way to think of it. Sex is very personal and very private; you're not gonna learn how women like to get fucked by studying what they openly share publicly about it.

Wait, sorry. I still mostly agree with this but I'm (slowly) learning to be less of a dick. Like this is just my opinion, since I'm sure some people learn reasonable facts from sex data. But I don't particularly get it.

I do want to mention this incredibly insightful book, called The Roots of Thinking by Maxine Sheets-Johnstone. She's a Courtesy professor at the University of Oregon who got her first PhD in Dance/Philosophy and holds an unfinished PhD in Evolutionary Anthropology. The book is basically about what led to apes realizing that four legs didn't work quite as well as standing up and walking bipedal with two legs. She is a woman, obviously, and in my opinion, clears up the entire argument through human evolution that "size doesn't matter."

This is what she says if extra-terrestrial Aliens managed to read the existing "data" about dicks, this is all they would learn:

Penile erection is an evolutionary elaboration of the basic male pattern of erection/expansion. In male primates—and male mammals generally—an external fleshy bodily organ rather than feathers and wings (or dewlaps, or in addition to hair or pouches) undergoes spatio-kinetic transformation in courtship and copulatory behaviors. The conformance of primate penile erection to basic male sexual display behavior is indeed further reason for calling the fact, dynamics, and significance of penile erection to attention. If Martian scientists were attempting to understand male primate sexual behavior on the basis of the literature alone, not only would they not necessarily even conceive of a penis—a fact intimated earlier—but they would certainly not conceive of its spatio-kinetic transformational powers or its dynamic conformance to basic male sexual display behavior. Thus to assume that the penis and penile erection can go without saying in accounts of primate sexual interactions on the grounds that explicit attention and description belabor the obvious skirts the point at issue. The following example will show that the omission constitutes a critical oversight with respect to primate sexual behavior generally and to veridical reconstructions of early hominid sexual behavior in particular (pg. 98).

Her thesis here:

Empirical grounds support the thesis that in the first major hominid speciating event-divergence of hominids from a common hominid/pongid ancestor-rapid and divergent evolution of the hominid. The purpose of this study is to show first that bipedality and penile display are inextricably linked. Second, it is to show in elaboration of Eberhard's thesis (a) how a large penis-the most conspicuous feature of hominid reproductive anatomy-and bipedalism-the most conspicuous hominid behavioral character by Darwin's original account-might originally have been linked through sexual selection; and (b) how their evolutionary bond was cemented by pleasure: by the hominids' finding "sweet" the activities in which they engaged. The thesis is not that hominid bipedality originated exclusively in sexual selection, but that given its incontestable link to penile display, sexual selection was a prime and critical factor in the move to consistent bipedality. Several major concepts attach to the undertaking and will be considered in turn: (1) the bipedal incentive; (2) the inverse relationship of nonhominid vulva to hominid penis; (3) the biological significance of tactile pleasure; and (4) the large human penis as evolutionary Product (pg. 168).

The book (there are probably better places to buy it than Amazon, if you're curious): https://www.amazon.com/Roots-Thinking-M ... 0877227691

So that's my opinion on why dick/sex data doesn't mean as much as the real thing. But curious to whatever your disagreement might be.

[Captain1117]

Hoping for some feedback on the key question

Do you think the implant gives you an advantage in the dating market?

[PowerliftingDad]

Confidence will give you an advantage over everything.
In my experience....woman find confidence and being an unselfish lover extremely attractive.
With the implant....you can be completely confident that your erection will stay rock hard for as long as you'd like.
You can change positions, speeds, take a break....and most importantly...put her satisfaction first....all without ever worrying about losing your erection.
That should make you feel incredibly confident and that.... will give you a tremendous advantage.

[Gt1956]

Hoping for some feedback on the key question
Do you think the implant gives you an advantage in the dating market?

Not quite the answer you're looking for. To a degree it does give you an advantage. It puts you ahead of the men that have ED, have PE, asexual or no sexual drive. I'd say that can put you ahead of alot of men.

But theres the women that couldn't care less about your ability. Maybe even not like it at all. I'm talking about women that don't like sex or might even be asexual. Those that have chronic painful sex. You could perhaps put a few lesbians that just want a mans income in that group.

Overall, I think you're ahead of more men than there are women that don't care.

[Username1]

Advantage? Zero

Why? You can have the biggest and best race car but unless you know all the ins and outs about the car, track, how the competition drives and how “to” drive …it all adds up to zero.

A friend f***s all types of women and he’s got a small dick. Why? He knows how to connect with them.