Brixtonguy wrote:wasim1 wrote:well according to my research Tactra Malleable is more hard then other M and lifetime is about 20 years.i m going to have Tactra on 18aug2023 in toronto
Cons:
Tactra has bending issues, making concealment difficult.
Girth sizing could be a problem if your anatomy does not fall into sizes 9, 11, 13 which Tactra is limited to, as opposed to Rigicon and the Shah implant which have more sizes. Improper sizing leads to erosion.
The hardness of Tactra and especially the hard and pointed distal tip makes it more prone to erode the glans with time. Rigicon and the Shah Implants have soft and rounded distal tips making them gentle to the delicate tissues of the penis including the glans.
Pros. Rigid.
20 years? No one knows. Rigicon and Tactra are only 3-4 years old. Indian Shah implant has been in use for 27 years. Save the issue of concealment, I will go for the Indian implant. It's got only silicon, no metals. And no problem of bent penis which is likely with the other two because of the metal component.Those who got Indian says rigidity is good including different positions. Just have to adapt to concealing it with tight underwear. Findings from my personal research. I'm considering having a malleable by November.
if i get indian shah implant i will have revision every 27 years?
