Peterpooped wrote:I am 49 and looking at getting an implant. FT has provided a plethora of information on implants. It has also given me a lot of anxiety. I have read alot about failures and revisions after only a short time. Does this happen a lot or is it the case of people with successful longer lasting implants don't post about them.
Witheringhog wrote:Peterpooped wrote:I am 49 and looking at getting an implant. FT has provided a plethora of information on implants. It has also given me a lot of anxiety. I have read alot about failures and revisions after only a short time. Does this happen a lot or is it the case of people with successful longer lasting implants don't post about them.
There is a 96% satisfaction rate, that includes the shit doctors. Goto a high volume doc and you will have extremely high odds of being hapoy.
ready2go wrote:Witheringhog wrote:Peterpooped wrote:I am 49 and looking at getting an implant. FT has provided a plethora of information on implants. It has also given me a lot of anxiety. I have read alot about failures and revisions after only a short time. Does this happen a lot or is it the case of people with successful longer lasting implants don't post about them.
There is a 96% satisfaction rate, that includes the shit doctors. Goto a high volume doc and you will have extremely high odds of being hapoy.
from a search on ft; Search found... 2202...matches: revisions.
A lot of redos and comments on getting the malfunctions fixed
Witheringhog wrote:ready2go wrote:Witheringhog wrote:
There is a 96% satisfaction rate, that includes the shit doctors. Goto a high volume doc and you will have extremely high odds of being hapoy.
from a search on ft; Search found... 2202...matches: revisions.
A lot of redos and comments on getting the malfunctions fixed
Dont get it then.
ready2go wrote:Witheringhog wrote:Peterpooped wrote:I am 49 and looking at getting an implant. FT has provided a plethora of information on implants. It has also given me a lot of anxiety. I have read alot about failures and revisions after only a short time. Does this happen a lot or is it the case of people with successful longer lasting implants don't post about them.
There is a 96% satisfaction rate, that includes the shit doctors. Goto a high volume doc and you will have extremely high odds of being hapoy.
from a search on ft; Search found... 2202...matches: revisions.
A lot of redos and comments on getting the malfunctions fixed
Journeyman wrote:ready2go wrote:Witheringhog wrote:
There is a 96% satisfaction rate, that includes the shit doctors. Goto a high volume doc and you will have extremely high odds of being hapoy.
from a search on ft; Search found... 2202...matches: revisions.
A lot of redos and comments on getting the malfunctions fixed
ED and not being able to fuck is way worse than a possible implant failure and revision
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tony=T and 67 guests
The FrankTalk.Org website strives to advance patient education about Erectile Dysfunction. The materials provided at this site are for educational purposes only and are not intended for use as diagnosis or treatment of a health problem or as a substitute for consulting a licensed medical professional. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of something you've read on the FrankTalk.Org website. We insist that readers discuss the information contained herein with their professional health care provider. We will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising there-from. FrankTalk.Org is not a medical website.