Gt1956 wrote:fucked0ne wrote:What's with the professional prejudice against malleables!? There's plenty of guys on this board who swear by them.
Funny that you bring that up. Searching through their posts reveals that not very many actually have an implant. They say they're the best but lots don't have one. Now I will admit that most seem to not be from the USA so the translations might not be perfect. Also, if a reason is given for them being better. It is usually centered around that they are cheaper.
Do you want an implant that works like an original dick should of or do you want the cheapest implant that you can get?
Ok guys. I'm tired of this malleable stuff. Its highly unlikely that I'll point out the downsides to them any more. Just think about Mark1974 telling about Dr. Levine's reaction when he said that he might get a malleable. A leading implant dr in the USA just shook his head no. That says it all.
When it comes to malleables, the parameters of discussion are not limited to a good implant that works like the original dick (i.e., IPP) vs cheap implant (i.e., malleables).
For many of us, operational issues in inflating and deflating, the possibility of short-term failures, and multiple revisions (with a higher risk of infection and penile shortening each time) do not make IPPs the more appealing option. And doctors may have a bias towards IPPs because not only do they receive higher surgical fees but also because of the prospect of repeated surgeries.
Until we know why Levine really shook his head, we know nothing.