AMS CX for a longer Phallus?

[Frosty]

My question is: Why would you want a bigger penis than that? Unless you're a porn actor, that is just too much for most women.

[ThatTallGuy]

My question is: Why would you want a bigger penis than that? Unless you're a porn actor, that is just too much for most women.

First off, thanks to everyone for their input.

Frosty: I'm not sure if this question was directed to me, but no...I'm not looking for more length, I was just asking what the difference would be between the flaccid length and the erect length with the CX since the CX doesn't expand or contract like the LGX does. From what I've read and from what others have said in their replies, it sounds like the flaccid length will be significantly more than before being implanted.

Ha! My wife would kill me if I presented to her more length or girth with an implant than I already have! If anything, she wants less.

[whatevery]

Again, it doesn’t give me much satisfaction to point out how wrong you are. But it has to be said.

You are selectively quoting from the studies. They both acknowledge that patients have shorter lengths post-op, that lengthen back to their pre-op length over time. That is the lengthening they are describing.

But they are both also clear that there are no gains compared to pre-op lengths:

“more importantly, no statistical difference was seen between the baseline ICI-induced penile length and measurements at the end of follow-up.” From the Antonini study I provided.

“Overall our study shows that the AMS 700 LGX provides a reliable solution to short penis syndrome post-IPP implantation, providing a penile length comparable to the natural erection.” From the study you provided.

And there are a bunch of other studies that confirm the same thing: when correctly sized and with a cycling protocol, inflatable implants of all types largely get guys back to their pre-implant size from their post-implant shrinkage.

But there is zero evidence that it makes them bigger than that.

That's the thing. You're quoting studies selectively and you're absolutely unequivocally 100% wrong. There are mountains of evidence that LGX enhances one length beyond his pre-op size. I'm not going to be looking for anything anymore but encourage everybody to do their own research and to always keep in mind that doctors would almost always try to lower your expectations, especially as it pertains to ever sought for penile length.

Besides that Leto, you don't have LGX yourself, but dare to brand most of LGX recipient on this forum liars. Because there are very LGX recipients here on FT whose erect penile length didn't exceed their pre-op length, mostly after less than a year of cycling.

But let's forget about the two of us. I encourage every new person on this forum to conduct his own research. Don't listen to non-LGX implantees talking about LGX. LGX is the only length expanding implant with proven track record of likely length expansion. Many of those that choose other implants wish their implants did the same.

Do what I did. Find LGX recipients on the forum. There are plenty of them here. PM them and get the true scoop away from the ego and envy related noise. Just remember that LGX is generally not recommended for people with Peyronie's, and generally works better on smaller dicks. Having larger penis would increase your chances of having rigidity issues with LGX.

Also, don't trust either Leto or me. Google LGX vs CX vs Titan yourself. See what pops up.

I'm going to paste these suggestions every time I see Leto express opinion on LGX.

PS. There is also Rigicon Infla10AX that claims to do the same length wise as does LGX but I'm yet to come across a single AX recipient that exceeded his pre-op length with AX and I came across few already. Carefully watching progress of three members that just got implanted with AX: 2 in the States and 1 in UK. Let's pray their dicks would reach for the stars!

[sambalamba]

Different studies on the same exact experiment can have different outcomes. It doesn't mean one is incorrect over the other. That's just the nature of scientific outcomes sometimes. Means more studies are needed. Study design and interpretation play a major role as well.

Chung et al. (2017) did the largest comparative analysis and the summary is as follows.

Analyzed 2,749 patients who had device replacement. At ≥2 years after initial implantation:
AMS 700 LGX: +1.2 cm mean cylinder length increase
AMS 700 CX: +1.1 cm mean cylinder length increase
Coloplast Titan: +0.9 cm mean cylinder length increase.

Differences were not statistically significant between the three devices. LGX showed a slight numerical advantage, but it was small. 60% of patients gained >0.5 cm, and 40% gained ≥1 cm overall.

On the other hand, Kim et al. (2019) did a study of AMS 700 LGX and stretched flaccid length increased from 11.1 cm to 12.2 cm at 12 months, and inflated length increased from 11.8 cm to 12.7 cm. This shows some length gain with LGX.

As you dive into the details you can see in both studies the length gain of LGX was similar. But one study just compared the LGX which would lead to the conclusion LGX creates length expansion. But the first comparative study would indicate almost insignificant advantage of the LGX towards length expansion.