arazon wrote:Bearskin777 wrote:Find a urologist who also specializes in Men's Sexual Health. Have them check you out, get an ultrasound to know whether or not you have venous leak or whatever. They can advise from there. If they say implant, find a high-volume surgeon with a good reputation.
.
As I mentioned in my 1st post, my doctor is Dr Hillelsohn with whom I'm considering to have an implant. He said that before an implant, he must do an ultrasound 1st which I dont want because that entails injection with trimix to get an erection and I've had bad experiences with trimix in the past. I really dont want trimix injection.
Instead of trimix, is it possible to use VED instead for the ultrasound?
Arazon, I am a layman, so this is a speculation, but grounded in some research. I will speculate that the injection with ultrasound is to induce a strong erection and then allow observation (and potential estimation of) venous leak (VL). If you do not have VL, your ED may have anothr cause which might be treatable. For a surgeon to do surgery without being certain there is not a less invasive way than implant might be less than due diligence.
If he just needs to observe the collapse of an erection, you might discuss inducing an erection with viagra, levitra or some such oral pill or something (even urethral suppository).
If he insists that an injection (even after you describe your prior bad experience) you have a choice. 1) You are going to trust this surgeon with a knife and your privates; why not trust him now with a needle and trimix? 2) If you don't fully trust this surgeon or feel like you are not being adequately "heard", perhaps another surgeon with whom you are more comfortable.
I spent a year searching for such a surgeon for me and do not regret it. (I used a V.E.D. -not for sex- to keep my penile tissues elastic and oxygenated.)