Loss of length-from LGX to CX
Loss of length-from LGX to CX
My CX implant appears to be more than one inch shorter when inflated than my LGX was. I know the CX doesn't expand in length, but has anyone else experienced this much loss when going from an LGX to a CX? Girth is about the same for each by the way..
Last edited by wolfcreek on Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Donnie1954
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Loss of length-from LGX to CX
With stretching you may regain some of that length. I did.
Donnie
Donnie
Implant AMS 700 CX, MS (18cm x 12mm with 5.5cm RTEs) on 10\4\16. 64 Dr. Edward Kata of Orlando. Awesome surgeon. Check out, 'DD Bryan. My implant journey, Wit and Wisdom, Stretching routine, Implant Pics, Natural Hang. Live in Ga.
.
.
-
Lost Sheep
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm
Re: Loss of length-from LGX to CX
wolfcreek wrote:My CX implant appears to be more than one inch shorter when inflated than my LGX was. I know the CX doesn't expand in length, but has anyone else experienced this much loss when going from an LGX to a CX? Girth is about the same for each by the way..
Do the tips extend into the glans as deeply as the LGX tips did?
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter
Re: Loss of length-from LGX to CX
Yes, even a bit further into the glans now (surgeon used slightly longer RTE's this time).
-
ThePlumber1964
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:03 pm
- Location: Orlando, FL. USA
Re: Loss of length-from LGX to CX
wolfcreek wrote:My CX implant appears to be more than one inch shorter when inflated than my LGX was. I know the CX doesn't expand in length, but has anyone else experienced this much loss when going from an LGX to a CX? Girth is about the same for each by the way..
Yes, from my first revision (LGX to CX) about an inch was gone.
54 years old, happily married for 30 years to a beautiful & outstanding lady. Onset ED at 49. Finally fixed on 11/08/2017 by the master Dr. Eid with a Titan XL 26, no RTEs! Previously had 3 AMS implants (LGX & CX), all botched.
-
Lost Sheep
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm
Re: Loss of length-from LGX to CX
wolfcreek wrote:Yes, even a bit further into the glans now (surgeon used slightly longer RTE's this time).
The deeper into the glans (all other things being equal, which is a BIG assumption), the deeper into the glans, the less overall length. The good news is that SST Syndrome (floppy head) is less likely.
What does your surgeon say?
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Mike1987a, Time2Change and 67 guests
