Durability study with 2,384 first implants

[wolfpacker]

Well, if the durability rate is kind of low and some of you experienced problems after 2,5 years even, wouldn't it be better to get a malleable implant versus the inflatable one?

No, the malleable has much lower patient and partner satisfaction ratings, and it also more likely to experience erosion, perhaps the most dreaded side effect of all.

[Gt1956]

I just did some internet snooping. The malleables seem to have a slightly higher infection risk. Lower satisfaction rate as mentioned. It just does not act or perform like a real erection. I.E. not as firm.
It is for men that have certain mobility restrictions.

[Waynetho]

I just did some internet snooping. The malleables seem to have a slightly higher infection risk. Lower satisfaction rate as mentioned. It just does not act or perform like a real erection. I.E. not as firm.
It is for men that have certain mobility restrictions.

Or some certain pornstars (JH2007) who are dissatisfied with the pump and tubing being visible and difficult to hide in video shots...

[Gt1956]

I just did some internet snooping. The malleables seem to have a slightly higher infection risk. Lower satisfaction rate as mentioned. It just does not act or perform like a real erection. I.E. not as firm.
It is for men that have certain mobility restrictions.

Or some certain pornstars (JH2007) who are dissatisfied with the pump and tubing being visible and difficult to hide in video shots...

I understand your point of view. But in his case I felt it was more of a money decision than anything else. I got the impression that he'd make more money without the pump requiring special angles & shots.
But yes, he does have a restriction in a unique way.