UKHelper2024 wrote:I've just read a post and someone said, imagine your flaccid penis, and an implant is that with 2 rock hard plastic rods in there when inflated. But for a grower surely this doesn't look good in terms of size? with an erection now I'm around 6.5-7in but as a grower very small when not aroused. How will this look with the implant (I'm in the process of inquiring about it). Visually I can't imagine it looking natural. My issue is blood flow so without blood flow will the implant still look natural or good?
This post you read doesn't match my experience at all. There are two issues here, size and blood flow.
The implant size is based on stretching your penis out, not on your flaccid size. I used to be a grower, but now I am a shower. Some people do complain about losing a little bit of length, but I've never heard of anyone talking about it being like flaccid size but with hard rods. Some people say the loss of size is because the penis atrophied during lack of erections because of ED. Others say everyone loses a little. A handful claim to have grown a bit.
On blood flow, there are two areas that swell up independently. One is your corpora cavernosa, which is the part that turns hard. But there's also the head of your cock and the area around the urethra which get fuller and more spongy. In my case, the problem was veinous leak, so I had plenty of blood flow into both the hard part and the spongy part, but the hard part wouldn't stay hard. Post implant, the spongy part still swells just fine. For some people, the flow into the spongy part doesn't work so well, so they use viagra/cialis or tablets into the urethra to help with that.
For what it's worth, this used-to-be grower loves his bionic cock.