Malleable Implanted (Tactra 27X13)

[fucked0ne]

This sounds conspiratorial to me. Maybe these dudes just don't want to take dick pics? There are plenty of nice looking malleable cocks out there. No need to pull an Alex Jones about these malleable phalluses...

I've spoken with a few malleable implantees on this board, and this is what they have told me in private (DM). Nothing "conspiratorial" or "Alex Jones" about it, though I can see why someone would think that given the omission.

Look up JH2007's posts on here. He's got a Tactra and probably the most prodigious penis on this forum, lol. Don't draw crazy conclusions because a few guys with malleables won't take photos of their penis for you. I could just as easily turn around and say "Yeah well all these guys with Titans, they're on a road to perdition because they're about to have a penis that has mechanical or pump failures in the very near future, doesn't matter how much girth you have if your cock still doesn't work even after extensive surgery." But there's no need to be that aggressive.

It's good to know the positives and negatives of both prostheses. Yes, the inflatables are susceptible to mechanical failure, which fucking sucks. The only alternative is the malleable, which has its own downsides. There needs to be more transparency as far as this is concerned. It would suck to go from inflatable to malleable and not know you're going to end up with something resembling a pencil, to be somewhat hyperbolic. As far as thedriver and JH2007 are concerned, they both seem to have had above average girth going into the procedure; but both have still claimed a girth loss of about an inch.

This board is supposed to be about information so people can make informed decisions; not just people talking about how great and wonderful their mechanical boners are. At least that's my opinion.

[fucked0ne]

Does anyone actually want to see it? I can post a flaccid photo and just put the penis upright

I have no idea who you are, what your face looks like. Yeah, just post an image. There are guys on this board with glans erosion who have posted images. I don't know who they are or what they look like either. The board functions on a principle of anonymity.

I don't know what TELEGRAM is, and I can't see downloading an app just to see a malleable prosthesis.

What about a PM? I believe images can be sent privately that way.

I've said many times over on this board that I'm very interested in swapping my inflatable for a Rigi10, but I would like more real-life examples of what to expect, whether filler will be necessary or not (most likely). JH2007 is a literal porn star, so that's not very helpful, his situation being so being exceptional; and thedriver seems to have been very girthy to begin with, hence he has no issue with showcasing his Genesis.

[frank66665]

I've spoken with a few malleable implantees on this board, and this is what they have told me in private (DM). Nothing "conspiratorial" or "Alex Jones" about it, though I can see why someone would think that given the omission.

Look up JH2007's posts on here. He's got a Tactra and probably the most prodigious penis on this forum, lol. Don't draw crazy conclusions because a few guys with malleables won't take photos of their penis for you. I could just as easily turn around and say "Yeah well all these guys with Titans, they're on a road to perdition because they're about to have a penis that has mechanical or pump failures in the very near future, doesn't matter how much girth you have if your cock still doesn't work even after extensive surgery." But there's no need to be that aggressive.

It's good to know the positives and negatives of both prostheses. Yes, the inflatables are susceptible to mechanical failure, which fucking sucks. The only alternative is the malleable, which has its own downsides. There needs to be more transparency as far as this is concerned. It would suck to go from inflatable to malleable and not know you're going to end up with something resembling a pencil, to be somewhat hyperbolic. As far as thedriver and JH2007 are concerned, they both seem to have had above average girth going into the procedure; but both have still claimed a girth loss of about an inch.

This board is supposed to be about information so people can make informed decisions; not just people talking about how great and wonderful their mechanical boners are. At least that's my opinion.

I agree with fucked0ne, I think if you are less than 6" it starts to be a problem to put a malleable for its loss of length, having 5" of girth could be another problem, we need this information, for men who are average which would be over 80%

[tobenormalagain]

I posted pics of my Tactra implant not long ago and they are easily assessed. I would be happy to answer any questions regarding malleable in general or the Tactra in particular

[IndianRasputin]

Does anyone actually want to see it? I can post a flaccid photo and just put the penis upright

I have no idea who you are, what your face looks like. Yeah, just post an image. There are guys on this board with glans erosion who have posted images. I don't know who they are or what they look like either. The board functions on a principle of anonymity.

I don't know what TELEGRAM is, and I can't see downloading an app just to see a malleable prosthesis.

What about a PM? I believe images can be sent privately that way.

I've said many times over on this board that I'm very interested in swapping my inflatable for a Rigi10, but I would like more real-life examples of what to expect, whether filler will be necessary or not (most likely). JH2007 is a literal porn star, so that's not very helpful, his situation being so being exceptional; and thedriver seems to have been very girthy to begin with, hence he has no issue with showcasing his Genesis.

Sure pm me

[duke_cicero]

I've spoken with a few malleable implantees on this board, and this is what they have told me in private (DM). Nothing "conspiratorial" or "Alex Jones" about it, though I can see why someone would think that given the omission.

Look up JH2007's posts on here. He's got a Tactra and probably the most prodigious penis on this forum, lol. Don't draw crazy conclusions because a few guys with malleables won't take photos of their penis for you. I could just as easily turn around and say "Yeah well all these guys with Titans, they're on a road to perdition because they're about to have a penis that has mechanical or pump failures in the very near future, doesn't matter how much girth you have if your cock still doesn't work even after extensive surgery." But there's no need to be that aggressive.

It's good to know the positives and negatives of both prostheses. Yes, the inflatables are susceptible to mechanical failure, which fucking sucks. The only alternative is the malleable, which has its own downsides. There needs to be more transparency as far as this is concerned. It would suck to go from inflatable to malleable and not know you're going to end up with something resembling a pencil, to be somewhat hyperbolic. As far as thedriver and JH2007 are concerned, they both seem to have had above average girth going into the procedure; but both have still claimed a girth loss of about an inch.

This board is supposed to be about information so people can make informed decisions; not just people talking about how great and wonderful their mechanical boners are. At least that's my opinion.

I do not disagree that it's important to know the positives and the negatives of the different prostheses, doctors, implantation methods, and so on. However, it's extremely important to remember that:

(1) There's an enormous amount of individual variation in all of this. Your penis (and your implant) are yours and yours alone, and there are a myriad of reasons why someone else's experience is different, even if they got the exact same hardware installed inside them.

(2) The fact that there are fewer malleable photos on this forum is not proof positive that the malleable implants are less effective or aesthetically pleasing or worthwhile.

(3) You can't base your life decisions on the results of an unscientific poll taken from responses garnered from a population of people who are actually more likely to be dissatisfied with their penile implant precisely for the reason that this website is the magnet for all kinds of negative feedback about these devices, procedures, experiences, etc. It's been said before here many, many times, but happily implanted people (apart from, say, thedriver) are less active on this forum because they're out there — in the real world, having uninterrupted sex.

[LastHope]

Well stated by Duke.

My 2 cents....

If your corpus cavernosum is significantly larger than 13-14 mm and you still opt for a malleable, you will find the outcome highly disappointing in terms of girth, even after seeing 100,000 malleable dick pics.

IMO, malleables are for those who prioritize reliability above all else.

When sized and installed by the right surgeon, they’re the Toyota or Honda of penile implants. They are fucking boring, but they will fucking run forever.

[fucked0ne]

Look up JH2007's posts on here. He's got a Tactra and probably the most prodigious penis on this forum, lol. Don't draw crazy conclusions because a few guys with malleables won't take photos of their penis for you. I could just as easily turn around and say "Yeah well all these guys with Titans, they're on a road to perdition because they're about to have a penis that has mechanical or pump failures in the very near future, doesn't matter how much girth you have if your cock still doesn't work even after extensive surgery." But there's no need to be that aggressive.

It's good to know the positives and negatives of both prostheses. Yes, the inflatables are susceptible to mechanical failure, which fucking sucks. The only alternative is the malleable, which has its own downsides. There needs to be more transparency as far as this is concerned. It would suck to go from inflatable to malleable and not know you're going to end up with something resembling a pencil, to be somewhat hyperbolic. As far as thedriver and JH2007 are concerned, they both seem to have had above average girth going into the procedure; but both have still claimed a girth loss of about an inch.

This board is supposed to be about information so people can make informed decisions; not just people talking about how great and wonderful their mechanical boners are. At least that's my opinion.

I do not disagree that it's important to know the positives and the negatives of the different prostheses, doctors, implantation methods, and so on. However, it's extremely important to remember that:

(1) There's an enormous amount of individual variation in all of this. Your penis (and your implant) are yours and yours alone, and there are a myriad of reasons why someone else's experience is different, even if they got the exact same hardware installed inside them.

(2) The fact that there are fewer malleable photos on this forum is not proof positive that the malleable implants are less effective or aesthetically pleasing or worthwhile.

(3) You can't base your life decisions on the results of an unscientific poll taken from responses garnered from a population of people who are actually more likely to be dissatisfied with their penile implant precisely for the reason that this website is the magnet for all kinds of negative feedback about these devices, procedures, experiences, etc. It's been said before here many, many times, but happily implanted people (apart from, say, thedriver) are less active on this forum because they're out there — in the real world, having uninterrupted sex.

(2) I didn't say it was proof positive; and I certainly don't think they're less worthwhile. Otherwise, I wouldn't be considering one.

(3) I would say that this point applies more to those with IPPs. How many people come on here to complain about their malleable? I can't think of one, yet here they are. Maybe they're here to just talk about how happy they are with their device. That's awesome; and if something is cool, I would like to see it. Now, that's not a demand but a request; and they don't have to do anything they don't damn well feel like. But that does cause justified speculation.

[duke_cicero]

Well stated by Duke.

My 2 cents....

If your corpus cavernosum is significantly larger than 13-14 mm and you still opt for a malleable, you will find the outcome highly disappointing in terms of girth, even after seeing 100,000 malleable dick pics.

IMO, malleables are for those who prioritize reliability above all else.

When sized and installed by the right surgeon, they’re the Toyota or Honda of penile implants. They are fucking boring, but they will fucking run forever.

Does that mean an IPP is a Jaguar? lol. A close friend of mine is a Jaguar technician, and the joke around the shop is: "We always ask what Jaguar owners actually drive since their car is in the shop so often."

[LastHope]

Well stated by Duke.

My 2 cents....

If your corpus cavernosum is significantly larger than 13-14 mm and you still opt for a malleable, you will find the outcome highly disappointing in terms of girth, even after seeing 100,000 malleable dick pics.

IMO, malleables are for those who prioritize reliability above all else.

When sized and installed by the right surgeon, they’re the Toyota or Honda of penile implants. They are fucking boring, but they will fucking run forever.

Does that mean an IPP is a Jaguar? lol. A close friend of mine is a Jaguar technician, and the joke around the shop is: "We always ask what Jaguar owners actually drive since their car is in the shop so often."

HAHAHAHA..
Another joke I’ve heard is that Land Rover owners are advised to keep two, one to drive while the other is in the shop!