gjmjoe017 wrote:Bwtbbb wrote:gjmjoe017 wrote:I’ve got two RTE’s on each side and have had my implant over two years with absolutely non problems and I use the hell out of it!I have never heard RTE’s are bad and cause problems,they are used to make the cylinders fit properly if the length needed to reach mid glans comes up a little short!
Just because you're happy with it doesn't mean that they don't cause you any problems. You probably have/will have a more wobbly erection which most men would prefer not to have.
So where did you get your data to support RTE’s causing a wobbly erection?Post that info based on a medical study and I’ll get concerned.My erections are like a steel rod!You won’t be able to come up with anything because there are no problems based on medical facts regarding this!
The location of the junction betweeh the rear tip of the implant and the inflatable tubes is important. If it is deep in your crus where your scar tissue holds the implannt or further forward. If the tissues (that is, your tissues) holding the rear portion of the implant are adhered to the nonexpanding rear tip, they have only so much tension or strength of grip that develops on the implant. Over time, that grip is just a certain tension. If the tissues are holding onto the inflatable portion of the implant, that grip gets to that same degree of tension or strength around the uninflated implant. But when you inflate, that grip tension is greater. For the relatively short time you remain inflated the implant is held more tightly than when the implant is uninflated. That is how it was explained to my by Dr Eid several years ago in an email.
It is not that they cause problems. It is that fewer RTEs put the inflatable portion of the implant deeper in your supporting pelvic crus' structure.
He also wrote about the importance of the junction between the rear tip and the inflatble portion being less stable than the inflatable tube, but did not go into details over that issue. But it was sufficient to say that having that junction stabilized as deep in the crus as possible was advantageous to a stable angle of erection.
I don't have medical journal citations, but do know there has been at least one study mentioned (and linked) in FrankTalk.