Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
ColoplastTitanUpOver
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2025 11:45 pm

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby ColoplastTitanUpOver » Tue Nov 11, 2025 1:12 pm

To me, the failure stats look more like edge cases, not what most users experience. I’m not a doctor or a researcher or a statistician, just a regular old Joe. In my view, the Titan has been thoroughly tested and uses the most impressive materials out there, and the whole system feels purpose-built for long-term durability.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
71, 8/2022 Radical Prostatectomy
Mixed results with Bimix
9/2024 Coloplast Titan 22cm Classic pump Dr. Heiber.
Best sex of my life.
Pre-Op girth: 6.1'
Post-Op girth: 6.5'
Gained 1.5 cm with VED
TRUST YOUR SURGEON!

principles
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:48 am

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby principles » Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:40 pm

Discovernew wrote:awesome research. Did chatgpt do the work for you or you did it manually?

Would love if you could do one for AMS.

This should be a sticky post.


Thanks, appreciate it. I also found it quite interesting. Mostly manual search. It started with a simple search and evolved into reading all those 17 pages of threads, mostly skimming through them. For 5-10 of these entries, their timeline was a bit confusing, so I asked chatgpt websearch to read their posts and extract a accurate/factual timeline.

It's also far from being a complete picture of all the Titan failures mentioned on Franktalk. With a more thorough search, I'm sure we could fetch alot more entries.

Code: Select all

Healthy 33y

Initial: 08/20
Latest: 11/25
TTR: Time-to-Revision (months)

   Device        TTR Reason
1. Titan 22+3    26  Tub. fail
2. Titan 24+2     2  Infected
3. Tactra 23/13   7  MP to IP
4. Titan 20+3    27  Tub. fail
5. Titan 24+1/24 --  Ongoing

principles
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:48 am

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby principles » Wed Nov 12, 2025 12:12 am

sambalamba wrote:Is there a way you can find out the total users who have Titan on the forum? Will give a good idea about the denominator. And then gather failure and Total AMS data.This will reveal additional data of failure percentages.and will establish a proper comparison even with assumption of bias being taken into consideration.


I'm a bit time-constrained at the moment, but I'm thinking of ways to achieve exactly that, programatically. Manually it'd take too long.

Code: Select all

Healthy 33y

Initial: 08/20
Latest: 11/25
TTR: Time-to-Revision (months)

   Device        TTR Reason
1. Titan 22+3    26  Tub. fail
2. Titan 24+2     2  Infected
3. Tactra 23/13   7  MP to IP
4. Titan 20+3    27  Tub. fail
5. Titan 24+1/24 --  Ongoing

sambalamba
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:31 am

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby sambalamba » Wed Nov 12, 2025 8:43 am

principles wrote:
I'm a bit time-constrained at the moment, but I'm thinking of ways to achieve exactly that, programatically. Manually it'd take too long.


Dude, if you can pull this off it would be a big achievement. I bet the sample population would be larger than the UT Southwestern study. You can let them know that you have a more comprehensive study and they can suck your cock :D
55 years. Using bimix 0.4 units. Works well but inconsistent and very inconvenient. Seriously considering an implant. 6.4 inches bone pressed length to tip, 5 inches girth base, 4.5 inches girth mid-shaft.

sambalamba
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:31 am

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby sambalamba » Wed Nov 12, 2025 8:51 am

sambalamba wrote:
principles wrote:
I'm a bit time-constrained at the moment, but I'm thinking of ways to achieve exactly that, programatically. Manually it'd take too long.


Dude, if you can pull this off it would be a big achievement. I bet the sample population would be larger than the UT Southwestern study. You can let them know that you have a more comprehensive study and they can suck your cock :D


Also lately I have been stricken by OCD of asking every people who has a Titan about their girth. I love the Titan for it's various advantages (except of course the tubing) but am a bit freaked out about getting painful dog ears. If you can indulge my OCD by sharing your girth would be much appreciated. :D
55 years. Using bimix 0.4 units. Works well but inconsistent and very inconvenient. Seriously considering an implant. 6.4 inches bone pressed length to tip, 5 inches girth base, 4.5 inches girth mid-shaft.

principles
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:48 am

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby principles » Fri Nov 14, 2025 2:16 am

sambalamba wrote:Also lately I have been stricken by OCD of asking every people who has a Titan about their girth. I love the Titan for it's various advantages (except of course the tubing) but am a bit freaked out about getting painful dog ears. If you can indulge my OCD by sharing your girth would be much appreciated. :D


I've never really measured girth, to be honest. My view is that if you feel girth is missing, you can just use a cock ring and you’ll have all the girth you had in your best years, even with a malleable.

I only had dog ears for the first couple of months. Eventually the implant settled and they disappeared. That was my experience, at least.

Code: Select all

Healthy 33y

Initial: 08/20
Latest: 11/25
TTR: Time-to-Revision (months)

   Device        TTR Reason
1. Titan 22+3    26  Tub. fail
2. Titan 24+2     2  Infected
3. Tactra 23/13   7  MP to IP
4. Titan 20+3    27  Tub. fail
5. Titan 24+1/24 --  Ongoing

principles
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:48 am

Re: Titan Failures on FrankTalk: User-Reported Time to Failure (through Nov 10, 2025)

Postby principles » Fri Nov 14, 2025 2:23 am

I improved and expanded this study quite a bit. If anyone wants to check it out, here’s the updated thread:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=27468

Code: Select all

Healthy 33y

Initial: 08/20
Latest: 11/25
TTR: Time-to-Revision (months)

   Device        TTR Reason
1. Titan 22+3    26  Tub. fail
2. Titan 24+2     2  Infected
3. Tactra 23/13   7  MP to IP
4. Titan 20+3    27  Tub. fail
5. Titan 24+1/24 --  Ongoing


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, Facebook, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], TikTokSpider and 65 guests