LGX vs CX Implants

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.



2435tjklAS
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby 2435tjklAS » Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:28 am

nuance wrote:What’s your flaccid size, how do you manage when it’s that big (just curious since most people are concerned about flaccid bulge)?

Flaccid is a touch over 7" now (used to be ~4.8" before implant). I "manage" it by wearing pouch underwear and not caring, especially after learning women are very attracted to bulge in the same way we are to their bodies. It's the biological imperative why humans are still alive.
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, 2021. Replaced Titan Classic Jan. 14, 2025.

Idiot who abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant.

Pre-op dick size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: Smaller

Goal: 10+" x 6+"

frank66665
Posts: 1684
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:18 am

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby frank66665 » Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:26 pm

you have to measure the penis without sticking the tape measure into the belly by 1.5", I measure 5.9" by simply placing the tape measure on the skin, otherwise I would have to say that they are 7.5", it concerns what is usable and not adding a piece of proximal, nothing personal 2435tjklAS, I suggest it to everyone, in order to actually understand the distal that can be used with an implant of a certain size, Even at 7" it's still a great penis
56, DE since 2010, the pills worked at high doses not well, on 01/23/23 titan one touch 22, Dr. Gabriele Antonini, Replacement from titan to cx 21 with ms pump on 04/03/2025, today I am almost 60 years old and have various pathologies, testosterone

2435tjklAS
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby 2435tjklAS » Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:55 pm

Anddd that's why I removed my pics and you can DM me if you want to see them. Not arguing with a bunch of dudes on the internet about how they don't believe the measurements, and according to the guy above, my dick is two inches smaller because I have 1.5" of fat in my "belly" so mine are fake.

Gotta defend myself that it's called "bonepressed" and I'm unsure where you saw a belly: https://streamable.com/tad45z
(Oh, since people are picky and curious I had surgery to remove a bladder stone on July 11th, so currently down there is a bit messed up.)

This is dumb. Calling another man's dick smaller than he thinks does nothing. They're all a matter of our own interpretation and how you measure yours is probably bullshit to other men too.

Edit: I put my dick pics back up. Because they're a pretty good end to an argument. I don't think there's any other way to interpret this as clear proof that getting an AMS 700 LGX penile implant has indeed made my dick bigger. And this is only the start (TEP and revisions to come).

Plus the pics show clearly how I have no idea where that dude saw 1.5" of "fat." I think I explained my sizing about as honestly as possible. Bending over is a factor for everyone and I think I'm one of the first to realize it. But my listed size seems right to me based on how I learned to measure it and how I interpret it (plus the entire point is the one before is smaller than the one after, and that's undeniable), but beyond that we're a bunch of dudes measuring and sharing our penis sizes. I trust NO ONE. :)
Last edited by 2435tjklAS on Mon Sep 02, 2024 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, 2021. Replaced Titan Classic Jan. 14, 2025.

Idiot who abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant.

Pre-op dick size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: Smaller

Goal: 10+" x 6+"

nuance
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 8:14 pm

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby nuance » Tue Aug 27, 2024 6:52 pm

Your pics were useful to me cause I wasn’t sure how AMS looks at that length. I always thought a titan is needed at that size to not look thin. If you’re willing to share side profile, it’ll help me lean more towards AMS. I was conflicted between comfort and girth.

frank66665
Posts: 1684
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:18 am

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby frank66665 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 3:08 am

Implantologists say that the penis is measured by pushing the pubic bone, this is a matter that concerns the operating room, I believe that to give a real idea of ​​how much penis is usable, you simply need to place the measuring tape without pushing it as if sticking it in, but I could be wrong, that's why a photo is worth a thousand words, there are defeatists, optimists and realists, a photo reveals a thousand words
56, DE since 2010, the pills worked at high doses not well, on 01/23/23 titan one touch 22, Dr. Gabriele Antonini, Replacement from titan to cx 21 with ms pump on 04/03/2025, today I am almost 60 years old and have various pathologies, testosterone

2435tjklAS
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby 2435tjklAS » Sun Feb 09, 2025 1:10 pm

frank66665 wrote:you have to measure the penis without sticking the tape measure into the belly by 1.5", I measure 5.9" by simply placing the tape measure on the skin, otherwise I would have to say that they are 7.5", it concerns what is usable and not adding a piece of proximal, nothing personal 2435tjklAS, I suggest it to everyone, in order to actually understand the distal that can be used with an implant of a certain size, Even at 7" it's still a great penis

Oh, after I reread I understand your point better but also why you're especially wrong. The photo I chose wasn't the absolute best one I had (more added now), but your overall message is still very much wrong - we are a bunch of men measuring the size of our penises. First, we all do it bone-pressed with a "ruler" (quit calling them tape measures). Second, your insertable length idea is bullshit (lose weight to decrease fat and make it usable)

Everyone could easily be criticized. Like, if I'm standing up very straight, I promise you it wasn't 9.5". But I acknowledged that in my writing and doubt most others even realize it. I'm also learning to point the ruler further down as it's been difficult finding the pubic bone. It doesn't matter if a doctor would find it .5" smaller. It does matter if some troll on the internet says I'm an entire 2 inches shorter when there's no evidence remotely close to that.

frank66665 wrote:Implantologists say that the penis is measured by pushing the pubic bone, this is a matter that concerns the operating room, I believe that to give a real idea of ​​how much penis is usable, you simply need to place the measuring tape without pushing it as if sticking it in, but I could be wrong, that's why a photo is worth a thousand words, there are defeatists, optimists and realists, a photo reveals a thousand words

Still wrong.

Please, everyone - I hope the next 20 replies are about how in your opinion one tiny aspect of my measurement photos might not be scientifically correct. Well no fucking shit they aren't. Promise you 99.9% of what other men share isn't either.

Lastly, mine is undoubtedly longer than it was before. That's all that matters. It works.

(And if I didn't explain it earlier, one problem with AMS 700 LGX is a girth maximum of 5.5" so I did lose size there. The CX has a larger one. But the Titan is probably ever larger and that's my current device.)
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, 2021. Replaced Titan Classic Jan. 14, 2025.

Idiot who abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant.

Pre-op dick size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: Smaller

Goal: 10+" x 6+"

Implant2025
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2024 1:31 pm
Location: DC

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby Implant2025 » Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:24 pm

nuance wrote:which has more girth and higher chance of cylinders rupturing?


Girth (least to most): LGX, CX, Titan
Rupturing: Yes if caused by dog ears, excessive wear. But not because of excessive pumping pressure. Tunica albuginea sets maximum girth.

I had a CX implanted on 1/29/25 by Dr Clavell in Houston. The LGX is good if you need <= 21 cm. It's ideal for shorter, thinner penises. He likes the CX for better reliability and bigger girths. For guys with big penises (7+) or large girth (>= 6 cm) he would likely recommend a Titan.

Anyone who is having an implant + correction of Peyronie's disease like me, must get a CX or titan implant to help prevent renewed curvature after surgery.
GM(73) ED for past 10 years. Before: 6.0"L, 5.5"G. After (30 days): 5.5"L, 5.25"G. AMS CX MS pump 18cm/17.5cm on 1/29/25 by Dr Clavell in Houston.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25902

Implant2025
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2024 1:31 pm
Location: DC

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby Implant2025 » Sun Feb 09, 2025 3:02 pm

It's easy to google "how to measure penis length." The proper measurement is with a ruler: one end pressing down against the fat pad as far as possible, the other end measuring to either the tip of the stretched penis: aka Stretched Penis Length (SPL) or the tip of the erect penis: aka Erect Penis Length (EPL).

Let's say a dude is 7" EPL. If he presses his abdomen against hers when they are having PIV sex, then 7" EPL is the length that matters for insertion in the vagina, since the fat pad will compress somewhat against the pelvic bone during sex. The length of the corresponding implant is a completely different measurement: it's the length in cm of the distal + proximal length of the corpora cavernosa.

I noticed when I read my surgeon's post-op surgical note that he referenced both my SPL and EPL before and after placing my implant.
GM(73) ED for past 10 years. Before: 6.0"L, 5.5"G. After (30 days): 5.5"L, 5.25"G. AMS CX MS pump 18cm/17.5cm on 1/29/25 by Dr Clavell in Houston.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25902

cbinspok
Posts: 756
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 7:45 pm

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby cbinspok » Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:55 am

My dick is straight as an arrow with a Lgx, and corrected the peyronies, I would say any implant will help straighten out a bender.
67years,fighting ed for over twenty years. A sever break, vit E, pataba, Viagra, massage Ved cilas, and I'm tired- throwing in the towel, Op for implant Mar 18, 2021 AMS LGX 18 x12 + 1 3cm RTE, gained girth and length, very glad I took the hard step.

User avatar
SWorks17
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:33 pm
Location: Garden Ridge, Texas

Re: LGX vs CX Implants

Postby SWorks17 » Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:49 am

bjb0606 wrote:I had a CX for 9 years. I just had a revision a month ago and really like what I'm seeing out of the LGX.
B


BJB, your signature shows that you currently have the Titan implant, so did you have the CX for 9 years and went to the LGX and then had to do another 2 revisions and went with the Titan?

57. ED after anterior approach back surgery
PIlls, Injections
AMS 700 CX 2012-2021
Revision 1 AMS 700 LGX 6/2021
Revision 2 AMS 700 LGX 08/2021
Revision 3 Titan 12/2021 Dr Hakky
Revision 4 Titan 10/23 Dr Hakky


SWorks
Age 67, Garden Ridge Texas, Boston Scientific Rezum procedure for benign enlarged prostate 19 May 21, AMS LGX 18cm with 3cm RT's installed 5 Nov 2021 by Major Dr Shane Barney, BAMC, San Antonio, Texas, Married 36 years.
DOD Pg 131, Faces Pg 27


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andy100, Discovernew, GoodWood, junk098 and 48 guests