hardness Titan vs. AMS

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Cartman
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:48 pm

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby Cartman » Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:47 pm

twister wrote:I had ams for 4 yrs and changed it for titan and the was best decision I ever made


I have the AMS and very happy, but what can the Titan offer that the AMS doesn't?

Thank you

dsawan
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:59 am

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby dsawan » Fri Feb 03, 2023 5:14 pm

twister wrote:I had ams for 4 yrs and changed it for titan and the was best decision I ever made


Do you find massive difference in hardness when errect?

User avatar
ShouldIwait
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:36 am
Location: Southern Calif

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby ShouldIwait » Sat Feb 04, 2023 1:24 am

If you wanted a larger flaccid, couldn't you just add a few pumps to the AMS implant and get equal flaccid size to Titan? And I know many guys do not pump their Titans to max for sex...its uncomfortable for them and/or woman...so is there really any advantage on either side?

Need help from those who have had BOTH?
56, ED 10-15 years. Pills, Bi, Tri then Quad Mix Injections- all slowly less effective. IPP July 2022 (Penscrotal, Titan, 22 + 1) @6mo back to OEM--7.2"L x 5.5"w

Hrc714
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2017 4:13 pm
Location: Baltimore area

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby Hrc714 » Sat Feb 04, 2023 7:06 am

I have had both. The AMS is softer, more comfortable, and more natural when deflated. The Titan may be harder when inflated but the hardness of AMS is beyond that of any natural erection. I posted a video demonstrating the AMS hardness when I had that unit. I crushed some cans with my dick. It seemed odd, but I could not think of any other way to demonstrate that feature.
My experience is the patient does not usually pick the device, rather they pick the surgeon who picks the device based on anatomy, experience with a particular device, and relationship with manufacturer.
Reaction to Viagra - Sudden hearing loss
Tri mix pain and loss of effectivity
Implant July 2017, AMS 700, 24 X 12 MM, 2 x .5 CM extension.
Implant failed Nov , 2021
Revision March 2022, Titan 26 cm.

Gt1956
Posts: 3042
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 2:47 pm

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby Gt1956 » Sat Feb 04, 2023 4:18 pm

dsawan wrote:
twister wrote:I had ams for 4 yrs and changed it for titan and the was best decision I ever made

Do you find massive difference in hardness when errect?

A popular test study shows them both inflated to 20psi. I'll bet that both a truck or a car tire will be of equal hardnes because the internal pressure is equal.
Flacid, I'm sure the LGX will be softer because its made of softer material. The CX should be the next firmest then the Titan when flacid. But you asked about inflated. I believe they should be equal or so close to equal when inflated that you can't tell the difference.
68yo, HBP at 40, high triglycerides at 45. Phimosis at 57. Type 2 at 60. Dr. William Brant May 1, 2023 CX 21cm w/no rte's penoscrotal 6" girth @ 6 months

dsawan
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:59 am

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby dsawan » Sun Feb 05, 2023 5:10 am

Hrc714 wrote:I have had both. The AMS is softer, more comfortable, and more natural when deflated. The Titan may be harder when inflated but the hardness of AMS is beyond that of any natural erection. I posted a video demonstrating the AMS hardness when I had that unit. I crushed some cans with my dick. It seemed odd, but I could not think of any other way to demonstrate that feature.
My experience is the patient does not usually pick the device, rather they pick the surgeon who picks the device based on anatomy, experience with a particular device, and relationship with manufacturer.


Do you find when LGX and Coloplast is inflated,is the Coloplast much harder?

dsawan
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:59 am

Re: hardness Titan vs. AMS

Postby dsawan » Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:46 am

MyImplant wrote:My original implant was the LGX 8 years ago and replaced it with a Titan 5 months ago.

The LGX is spectacular for the length expandability and I do not recall having a serious bulge problem. My problem with the LGX is that pump was difficult to inflate and sometimes I just failed to inflate. There is a need to a quick squeeze of the pump that hopefully would result in= a "popping" sensation. If you fail to achieve this you will continuously pump thinking you are inflating when you are simply recirculating the fluid. Very frustrating when you are ready for action and you are having an argument with your pump. So the way I dealt with that is to eventually get it pumped up and leave it hard until the next time. Among other things this means that you are not returning the fluid to the reservoir increasing the possibility of encapsulation and of course the bulge resulting from your "permanent hardon". The good news is that deflation was easy and worked. AMS pump gets brownie points there. Yes it is true about the natural hang.

BUT BUT BUT the best part of the LGX is the expandability. When I got my revision I added 4 CM tp the cylinder lengths. That is a lot!. I personally give the expandability feature for half of this increase and the other half to my continuous use of a VED AND hanging weights.

So if one can master the task of switching to inflate mode and you want more length and you want to avoid the bulge I would recommend the LGX.

I decided on the revision because I felt I had enough length and I wanted more girth and I wanted to be able to inflate every time. Hence the Titan.

Well I got 4 CM of additional length (I would have got this with another LGX although some of this might be in extra RTEs). YES I got the easy and reliable inflation. BUT then I got a back-filling problem, a very "hard" flaccid dick.. (cylinders of the Titan are more durable and stiffer. HOWEVER my complaint about the Titan may not have anything to do with the Titan. My doctor whom I still trust elected to reuse the AMS reservoir rather than to install a new Titan reservoir which is larger and has a back-fill preventer valve. Reduced risk of infection etc.

The result is that now I have a really large flaccid dick with stiff cylinders that bulge a lot.

BOTTOM LINE FOR THE AMS vs TITAN comparison.. Just like the advertising says.. It is that simple.. Softer easier hang vs stiffer hanging cock. I think both are well designed and will last a long time. You cannot lose with either. BUT… I love my Titan when I do not have to go out in public. Hiding behind my sun glasses I am focusing on eye movement of women I walk by and none seem to notice. So I guess this is all in my head. But it really does stick out and I can trace my 7 inches in my pants. I see the outline of my glans and I am surprised that women do not notice. So what is the worst thing that can happen? They think I am some dirty old perverted man. I object.. I am not dirty.


When LGX and Coloplast is inflated,which device is more regid?


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sputnik, tobenormalagain and 298 guests