Stories of failure
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:57 am
Stories of failure popping up more than usually lately.
Moron docs leaving open holes in the scrotum, destroying urethras, causing unbearable pain by installing too long cylinders, diagnosing with infection and wanting to take the whole thing out when there is no infection, reservoirs in the leg (!), curved penises due to incorrect cylinder length, floppy heads due to too short cylinders, infections.
The list is long.
None of them has been caused by one of the top docs.
And still, every time I or someone else give the advice to go to one of the best, a shitstorm of replies will say that
"not only the top docs can do this surgery"
"if you fly to X or Y you will overfly a lot of good surgeons"
"there are a lot of low volume doctors who are just as good as the famous ones"
"the high volume docs do not have time to treat you as passionately as the local doc"
Bla, bla, bla.
Well, no, not only the top docs can do the surgery. But since we know they can, and we know a fair percentage of the rest can't, why risk going to someone else and be the unlucky one to find a crap doc?
Yes maybe you overfly a couple of good ones. But you will overfly a couple of idiots as well. And you don't want to take the risk of ending up under their knife. Mostly you will overfly a whole lot of mediocre/average ones, who might get you a decent result at an increased risk compared to the top ones. And why take the risk with any of them?
No, there probably are not many low volume docs as good as the famous ones. Maybe good enough if you settle for average. But not if you want the best possible outcome with the minimal risk of a horror show.
Seems nobody is complaining about the responsiveness and passion of e.g. Eid or Kramer...
And as I have linked before, there is research clearly showing the strong correlation between number of surgeries the doc performs and a low infection rate.
I understand there will always be poeple who cannot for some reason go to the top docs. Insurance/financial maybe the obvious one.
But stop giving me the crap that the top 2-4 are not better. Because they are.
Finding another one who is good is possible. But it is simply a matter of risk. Going with them eliminates the risk of you choosing the wrong doc. And that is a bloody good start of getting good results from your implant surgery.
Moron docs leaving open holes in the scrotum, destroying urethras, causing unbearable pain by installing too long cylinders, diagnosing with infection and wanting to take the whole thing out when there is no infection, reservoirs in the leg (!), curved penises due to incorrect cylinder length, floppy heads due to too short cylinders, infections.
The list is long.
None of them has been caused by one of the top docs.
And still, every time I or someone else give the advice to go to one of the best, a shitstorm of replies will say that
"not only the top docs can do this surgery"
"if you fly to X or Y you will overfly a lot of good surgeons"
"there are a lot of low volume doctors who are just as good as the famous ones"
"the high volume docs do not have time to treat you as passionately as the local doc"
Bla, bla, bla.
Well, no, not only the top docs can do the surgery. But since we know they can, and we know a fair percentage of the rest can't, why risk going to someone else and be the unlucky one to find a crap doc?
Yes maybe you overfly a couple of good ones. But you will overfly a couple of idiots as well. And you don't want to take the risk of ending up under their knife. Mostly you will overfly a whole lot of mediocre/average ones, who might get you a decent result at an increased risk compared to the top ones. And why take the risk with any of them?
No, there probably are not many low volume docs as good as the famous ones. Maybe good enough if you settle for average. But not if you want the best possible outcome with the minimal risk of a horror show.
Seems nobody is complaining about the responsiveness and passion of e.g. Eid or Kramer...
And as I have linked before, there is research clearly showing the strong correlation between number of surgeries the doc performs and a low infection rate.
I understand there will always be poeple who cannot for some reason go to the top docs. Insurance/financial maybe the obvious one.
But stop giving me the crap that the top 2-4 are not better. Because they are.
Finding another one who is good is possible. But it is simply a matter of risk. Going with them eliminates the risk of you choosing the wrong doc. And that is a bloody good start of getting good results from your implant surgery.