FrankTalk.org

I read many threads of guys gloating about their implants that they could keep on going and going giving their partners multiple orgasms without going flaccid as a normal penis would after ejaculating. My question to the guys: say hypothetically you had a choice of going back to a normal penis without ED but going flaccid as would happen after ejaculating, would you trade in your bionic penis for this option bearing in mind that you would not be able to achieve erection again until after the refractory period and not having the ability to give your partners multiple orgasms? Benefit of going back to a normal penis would be that it would not be a mechanical process to achieve an erection as is with an implant.

Would any ladies who's partners have a bionic penis opt for going back to a normal penis without ED?

Some rare men HAVE gone back to normal. My doctor told me about a patient who came to him after being implanted by another doctor. The guy didn't have ED and the implant was only to enhance his abilities. His new partner hated it so he insisted on being explanted (have the implant removed). After removal and recovery, this patient was able to have natural, hard erections like most men do. The theory is that he was lucky in that the implanting doctor didn't damage the corpora but rather dilated them enough to get the implant in so there was enough spongy tissue and blood vessels remaining to provide a hard erection.

Don’t think my wife would go back. She loves my bionic cock as she rides it like a cowgirl should! I would have to think awhile before I answered as I love my bionic cock. Don’t think of it as mechanical at all.

Would I prefer to be rich, good looking and 25 again? Or should I be thankful for what I have now and make the most of it?

Kind of a trick question. Kind of like man I wish I had my 69 firebird back but that ain't happening either.

I had a lot of good times with my pre ed penis. I had a lot of control over it. It came up pretty much when I wanted it to and stayed there till I did not want it to. I have finished before and still kept going. I was lucky to be able to finish a couple times myself with little refractory period.

Then a fall about 3 feet straight down on a 2 by 8 beam. Laid under that porch for an hour till I could move. Problems for next 3 years till my implant. If I knew at month 1 after that fall what it took me over 2 years to find out with numerous docs and tests. I would have been implanted as soon as the bruises and swelling went down from that fall.

So would I like my pre fall pre ed dick back. You bet. If the wind blew hard on it I got erect. Worked great. The only difference really between that dick and this one is I have to pump my dick up now. It goes up when I want it to and stays there till I want it to go down.

My perspective is a lot different than a lot of posters. I lost a hell of a lot to me when I fell. I definitely took it for granted and the sex life it granted me. When it was gone I wanted it back, and was worth whatever pain, recuperation, etc it took to get it back. I hate this pump in my sac but it is a small price to pay for a hard dick. It is an inconvenience and that is it. Hardly noticeable.

Skier123, I think mod123 is asking a slightly different question. Would an implant be a step up (worth the trouble, risk and expense) or a step down.

Kind of like, if a runner who can do a mile in 6 minutes were offered this choice: Cut off your feet and have realistic-looking prosthethic feet that would enable you to do a 3 minute mile. But if the prosthetics break, you are on crutches until you get them replaced. Would you do it?

A man who can have natural, spontaneous erections and stay hard enough for long enough to satisfy his partner offered this choice: Give up ever being able to have an erection ever again, but you can, with the prosthetic, stay erect indefinitely. But if it fails you are 100% impotent.

The classic Faustian bargain.

In my case, my penis worked, but not all that well. So, I stayed on oral medications until they failed to work at all. So, I was like the runner able to do a mile in 12 minutes and getting slower quickly. Now I can do that 3 minute mile....all night long...or until I fall asleep from exhaustion.

Mod123's post is fairly common from the younger members. He has just worded it differently. And perhaps a bit wrong from my point of view.
You're getting an implant because you can't go back. There is NO going back option. Getting an implant is facing the reality that the old dick is gone, forever. The new normal going forward is that you'll need to play with your sack to get an erection. Some of the side effects are beneficial. Like firmer & longer lasting erections. Some down sides like hang or needing a revision.
Women (even young women) are adaptable. Intercourse can mean solo play, dildos, vibrators, oral or even fucking machines. I bet that most women, even young, will adapt to an implant after getting it a time or two. Women talk. One thing that I've had relayed to me is they don't like a "soft dick fuck". They hate ED even more. New guys. You likely have two of the things that they dislike the most. In cards, you fold that hand.
Members, of any age, will take awhile to accept that there really are few choices. These types of questions will continue.
Mod123, please bear with this learning process. It may take some time to accept but this is pretty much your only long term solution if you have ED.

A natural penis that works is allways going to be better. The prosthesis is something that you use when your dick doesn't work, so it helps you to be able to maintain an erection but you already have erectile dysfunction. Furthermore, when you are implanted the pleasure that you have when the penis is filled with blood isn't there any more as your corpus cavernosum is severely damaged. This is something that is ok for people who can't maintain an erection but not comparable to something that is natural and works like it should.

Pretty much agree with everyone that's posted so far. Any man would love to have a dick that goes up on it's own, a natural erection. An implant is the long term solution when the erections stop happening, no matter how young or old.
It's kind of like a blown out knee, do you walk around on crutches for years or have a bionic knee put in?

Gt1956 wrote:Mod123, please bear with this learning process. It may take some time to accept but this is pretty much your only long term solution if you have ED.

I suspect, especially from reading Mod123's other posts that he does not (yet) have E.D. His question seems to be focused on implant as elective surgery as an enhancing body modification.

Some men might think it is a good trade-off, a perpetual, on-demand erection in exchange for a working penis with all the natural sensations intact. Mod123 is wise enough to ask if the downsides outweigh the upsides. SW0110's comment about his long-lost '69 Firebird is spot-on.

Of course, there is an alternate question as well. Would a woman in a relationship with a man with a penis that works as it should prefer it if that same man had an implant? If it were her choice alone, would she opt to give him the operation?

Hypotheticals. We men who NEED the implant find the question essentially irrelevant. As an academic exercise, it is ... well, it is what it is.