Anyone Here Had An Implant Replaced Years Down the Road?
Posted: Mon May 24, 2021 1:36 pm
Hi, folks, my story is long but the question kind of requires the explanation. I appreciate your indulgence.
I have major ED problems that began as a side effect of taking Finasteride for BPH for years - my urologist failed to mention it as a side effect until it was a done deal. I had a Urolift procedure two years ago, which took care of the BPH. A year later my large ejaculations and even "pre-cum" were back (hadn't had 'pre' in so long I'd forgotten to expect it) but I only had a partial ED recovery, it's very unpredictable but nearly always there to some degree. I can get good but not fantastic results from pills, but have everything from days of headaches and body aches after to migraines, my first in 40 years. Not good, and in my mind, not worth it. My present urologist tried an injection and his verdict was "harder, but not rigid", and both the thought and its cost are big turn-offs for me.
The one good surprise about Finasteride is that another side effect was reversal of long-term male pattern baldness. I got so used to having hair again that I indulged the half-mohawk I'd always wanted to try, and got so many friends and strangers speaking up in admiration that I have kept it for two years now.
As my baldness started creeping in again, my GP assured me that low-dose Finasteride (much lower than I'd taken for BPH) could still be used for my baldness without the side effects of larger doses. Boy, was he wrong - ejaculatory volume dried to a trickle within three months, and it seems the ED is getting worse again, so the thought of an implant is once again in my mind. My longsuffering partner (we've been together nearly 20 years) says he's OK with how things are, but I can't help but feel I'm being selfish by choosing hair over his (and therefore also my) satisfaction physically.
As I've researched the possibilities, one thing that keeps coming up is the average "life" of an implant. Ten years or so seems to be the consensus of doctors I've read reports from. Is there anyone here who's had an implant long enough to have to replace it just from old age, rather than sooner from a defect? If so, what is it like to go through that twice? Is it worth it to make such a drastic change for something with a limited shelf-life, as it were?
I have major ED problems that began as a side effect of taking Finasteride for BPH for years - my urologist failed to mention it as a side effect until it was a done deal. I had a Urolift procedure two years ago, which took care of the BPH. A year later my large ejaculations and even "pre-cum" were back (hadn't had 'pre' in so long I'd forgotten to expect it) but I only had a partial ED recovery, it's very unpredictable but nearly always there to some degree. I can get good but not fantastic results from pills, but have everything from days of headaches and body aches after to migraines, my first in 40 years. Not good, and in my mind, not worth it. My present urologist tried an injection and his verdict was "harder, but not rigid", and both the thought and its cost are big turn-offs for me.
The one good surprise about Finasteride is that another side effect was reversal of long-term male pattern baldness. I got so used to having hair again that I indulged the half-mohawk I'd always wanted to try, and got so many friends and strangers speaking up in admiration that I have kept it for two years now.
As my baldness started creeping in again, my GP assured me that low-dose Finasteride (much lower than I'd taken for BPH) could still be used for my baldness without the side effects of larger doses. Boy, was he wrong - ejaculatory volume dried to a trickle within three months, and it seems the ED is getting worse again, so the thought of an implant is once again in my mind. My longsuffering partner (we've been together nearly 20 years) says he's OK with how things are, but I can't help but feel I'm being selfish by choosing hair over his (and therefore also my) satisfaction physically.
As I've researched the possibilities, one thing that keeps coming up is the average "life" of an implant. Ten years or so seems to be the consensus of doctors I've read reports from. Is there anyone here who's had an implant long enough to have to replace it just from old age, rather than sooner from a defect? If so, what is it like to go through that twice? Is it worth it to make such a drastic change for something with a limited shelf-life, as it were?