*** For all those that were able to perform pre-implant, just not optimally ***
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2022 4:46 pm
As the title states, I would like to hear the experiences of those that were able to perform sexually, but just not in the way they wanted to perform, e.g. needed loads of Viagra/Cialis to stay erect, lost rigidity when not continually stimulated or in certain positions, had to wear a very tight cock ring, etc.
Thus, I am not addressing the men here that basically had not other option than having the implant (e.g. those with ED after prostatectomy), but only those that had actually quite a lot to lose.
As you may understand, I am in that position. I am scheduled for P.I. surgery in December (with European high volume specialist). Although I have been studying and deliberating the pros and cons for years, I still am in doubt if I should choose for a surgery or not.
A bit about me: in my forties, suffering from ED most of my adult life, in good health, tried every medical and mental approach (PDE5-i, injections, psychologist, sexologist, etc.), however, erections are only of (reasonable) good quality when combining high dosages of PDE5-i and a tight cock ring. Even then, the erection during penetrative sex often diminishes to 75% hardness, which is not very satisfactory for both parties, and some positions (specifically lying on back like in 'cow girl') are a definite no-go.
Despite of the limitations and frustrations, sex is a very important part of my life that I enjoy very much, and I am sexually active every day (either with a partner or solo sex). Thus, as I see it, I have "quite a lot to lose" if the P.I. surgery would prevent me from keep doing that (or would introduce even greater limitations).
My question to all men that have been (or still are) in a similar position: what made you decide to choose for P.I. surgery (y/n) and, most importantly (!), if you choose that route, would you make the same decision in hindsight?
What, in particular, are important issues for me that may make me decide NOT to opt for P.I. surgery in December are:
- My dick is large (22cm length x 17 cm circumference; i.e. 8.7 x 6.7 inch). I take great pride in having a big dick (I completely agree, its not what is important for good sex. Actually, quite the contrary....) and P.I. likely will result in a loss of size. Specifically, concerning the girth as implants are available in different lengths but not with different circumferences.
- I am sexually active every day. This greatly increases the chances that the implant will have to be replaced after a relatively short period of time, and for mutiple times during my life.
- I am not in a relationship. When dating or having a one night stand I would find it quite embarrassing to pump up in front of a women (even more than putting on a cock ring, as is the case right now).
- I travel quite a lot and often accompanied by colleagues. I have read the stories of the 'red light' the implant sets off at airport securities controls. It would be so unfomfortable to face that situation every time I travel.
Of course there are a lot of other potential reasons not to take a P.I. (and a lot of reasons in favor of a P.I.), but the previous ones are the objections that most likely have the largest weight when I weigh the pros and cons and try to answer the question: should I take a P.I. yes or no?
Thus, I am not addressing the men here that basically had not other option than having the implant (e.g. those with ED after prostatectomy), but only those that had actually quite a lot to lose.
As you may understand, I am in that position. I am scheduled for P.I. surgery in December (with European high volume specialist). Although I have been studying and deliberating the pros and cons for years, I still am in doubt if I should choose for a surgery or not.
A bit about me: in my forties, suffering from ED most of my adult life, in good health, tried every medical and mental approach (PDE5-i, injections, psychologist, sexologist, etc.), however, erections are only of (reasonable) good quality when combining high dosages of PDE5-i and a tight cock ring. Even then, the erection during penetrative sex often diminishes to 75% hardness, which is not very satisfactory for both parties, and some positions (specifically lying on back like in 'cow girl') are a definite no-go.
Despite of the limitations and frustrations, sex is a very important part of my life that I enjoy very much, and I am sexually active every day (either with a partner or solo sex). Thus, as I see it, I have "quite a lot to lose" if the P.I. surgery would prevent me from keep doing that (or would introduce even greater limitations).
My question to all men that have been (or still are) in a similar position: what made you decide to choose for P.I. surgery (y/n) and, most importantly (!), if you choose that route, would you make the same decision in hindsight?
What, in particular, are important issues for me that may make me decide NOT to opt for P.I. surgery in December are:
- My dick is large (22cm length x 17 cm circumference; i.e. 8.7 x 6.7 inch). I take great pride in having a big dick (I completely agree, its not what is important for good sex. Actually, quite the contrary....) and P.I. likely will result in a loss of size. Specifically, concerning the girth as implants are available in different lengths but not with different circumferences.
- I am sexually active every day. This greatly increases the chances that the implant will have to be replaced after a relatively short period of time, and for mutiple times during my life.
- I am not in a relationship. When dating or having a one night stand I would find it quite embarrassing to pump up in front of a women (even more than putting on a cock ring, as is the case right now).
- I travel quite a lot and often accompanied by colleagues. I have read the stories of the 'red light' the implant sets off at airport securities controls. It would be so unfomfortable to face that situation every time I travel.
Of course there are a lot of other potential reasons not to take a P.I. (and a lot of reasons in favor of a P.I.), but the previous ones are the objections that most likely have the largest weight when I weigh the pros and cons and try to answer the question: should I take a P.I. yes or no?