FrankTalk.org

ThailandBound wrote:I'm single with a girlfriend 33 years younger than me.

I have at times fucked her in the ass for well over :45 minutes. More than once, over an hour. She loved every minute of it and has commented on how much she likes it that her boyfriend "has power" (the Thai girl term for ability to maintain an erection).

So, yeah. You should do well in the dating scene. Many, if not most, women are multi-orgasmic. Those intense 6 minutes of fucking you mention are enjoyable to them but there are plenty of women out there who silently accept that for them it's "game over" in terms of their pleasure when the guy cums, quits, and falls asleep. You are not that guy.

2435tjklAS wrote:Learning what women are sexually interested in and attracted based of its "data," is a completely terrible and unrealistic way to think of it. Sex is very personal and very private; you're not gonna learn how women like to get fucked by studying what they openly share publicly about it.

Penile erection is an evolutionary elaboration of the basic male pattern of erection/expansion. In male primates—and male mammals generally—an external fleshy bodily organ rather than feathers and wings (or dewlaps, or in addition to hair or pouches) undergoes spatio-kinetic transformation in courtship and copulatory behaviors. The conformance of primate penile erection to basic male sexual display behavior is indeed further reason for calling the fact, dynamics, and significance of penile erection to attention. If Martian scientists were attempting to understand male primate sexual behavior on the basis of the literature alone, not only would they not necessarily even conceive of a penis—a fact intimated earlier—but they would certainly not conceive of its spatio-kinetic transformational powers or its dynamic conformance to basic male sexual display behavior. Thus to assume that the penis and penile erection can go without saying in accounts of primate sexual interactions on the grounds that explicit attention and description belabor the obvious skirts the point at issue. The following example will show that the omission constitutes a critical oversight with respect to primate sexual behavior generally and to veridical reconstructions of early hominid sexual behavior in particular (pg. 98).

Empirical grounds support the thesis that in the first major hominid speciating event-divergence of hominids from a common hominid/pongid ancestor-rapid and divergent evolution of the hominid. The purpose of this study is to show first that bipedality and penile display are inextricably linked. Second, it is to show in elaboration of Eberhard's thesis (a) how a large penis-the most conspicuous feature of hominid reproductive anatomy-and bipedalism-the most conspicuous hominid behavioral character by Darwin's original account-might originally have been linked through sexual selection; and (b) how their evolutionary bond was cemented by pleasure: by the hominids' finding "sweet" the activities in which they engaged. The thesis is not that hominid bipedality originated exclusively in sexual selection, but that given its incontestable link to penile display, sexual selection was a prime and critical factor in the move to consistent bipedality. Several major concepts attach to the undertaking and will be considered in turn: (1) the bipedal incentive; (2) the inverse relationship of nonhominid vulva to hominid penis; (3) the biological significance of tactile pleasure; and (4) the large human penis as evolutionary Product (pg. 168).

Captain1117 wrote:Hoping for some feedback on the key question
Do you think the implant gives you an advantage in the dating market?