I don't agree with his paragraph on length. He mentioned two different studies (here's their full-text if you want to check
https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/21681805.2017.1339292 and
https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.011) and neither of them even do what he says, which is they "tones down the magical length-increasing features of the LGX." They're also 5 years old and 6 years old, and yes, implants causing size loss used to be the #1 patient complaint. But turns out the patients who complained back then were a bunch of pussies who didn't exercise it (note: your doctor telling you to cycle 15 minutes a day is not a sufficient amount of exercise, and I believe, like what happens in tons of health care departments, is you got incredibly conservative and safe directions with the goal of minizine any illusionary patient fears of injuries and minimizing malpractice claims, and obviously not with the goal of making your dick longer).
Here's the first source he linked directly explaining why it actually works?
The AMS 700 LGX cylinder is an IPP with the unique ability to increase owing to its middle layer of Dacron/Lycra bidirectional weave that allowed for expansion in both girth and length. The ability to expand in both directions could be responsible for its performance in the compression test. The pressure increase caused by fluid mobilized with the compression can dissipate in more than one dimension, making it the softest of the existing IPPs
And the second source is only three paragraphs long and it also explains how length gain is possible/likely?
A total of 2,749 patients (1,532 with 700 LGX, 717 with 700 CX and 500 with Titan IPP) met inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent device replacement before 2 years did not experience an increase in mean cylinder length. By comparison, patients who underwent device replacement after 2 years experienced significant increases in mean cylinder length (1.2 cm with LGX, 1.1 cm with CX and 0.9 cm with Titan, p <0.001). Mean increases in length at 2 years or after were similar among the 3 devices (p ΒΌ 0.20). Of the patients 60% demonstrated increases greater than 0.5 cm, and 40% displayed increases 1 cm or greater. These are important data to consider when selecting a prosthesis to implant. Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence? responsible for its performance in the compression test. The pressure increase caused by fluid mobilized with the compression can dissipate in more than one dimension, making it the softest of the existing IPPs.
Not only do the 2 studies he mention support the argument that this device can increase your length, but I can link a whole lot more that also claim increases of 1cm, 2cm, or 3cm is to be expected. Here's some:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=20121Also if you'd like to understand the science behind why VEDs are effective at fixing your dick's scared down tissue, here's how they work and why they're safe:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18561&p=169469#p169469 If you use your VED before you get an implant, that will work to fix any size losses you have experienced due to ED, which happens to literally every man. The goal is to make your dick get back to how it was when you were a horny 20 year old. VED helps that, then the surgeon will measure you when you're asleep and size you with an implant that best meets your real, original dick. After that, stick an implant in - that's not going anywhere. Also use a VED and do other exercises after, and boom, solve your ED and get a bigger dick! Because literally, you can.
Every single bit of current medical research supports these points. Anecdotal personal experiences like my own increase in length also supports them.
Lastly I'm sharing this chat cause I think it's funny.
