FrankTalk.org

I went back and forth before finally choosing the Coloplast Titan. Yeah the name is cool but really who gives a fuck about a name . I wanted what I thought was best for my situation. I watched many videos on YouTube from the different docs with the pros and cons of each . It really was a tough decision. The tipping point towards the Titan was probably because I had Peyronie's disease and thought the strength of the Titan would help straighten out my member in addition to Dr. Clavell doing the incision surgery. I have no bias towards either. I would have no problem choosing an AMS in a future revision. I'll just wait and see what improvements / innovation these two companies come up with for future implants and reevaluate what I think is best for me at that time .

I had exactly the same reasons. Right after surgery my Peyronies curves (to the left and up) were gone. I'm hoping the tougher tubes will help me regain lost length because of the 6-week hiatus.

At this point, with almost 5 years with the Coloplast, if I had to do a revision/replacement, I'd go with the Titan again. Reason being...girth and rigidity.
stmfttr

I just asked my urologist about implants and he picked AMS 700 LGX. I didn't look into it, figured he knew what he was doing. I had not heard of the Titan back then, but if I would have I would have looked into both options. If I saw this advertisement I would go for this kind. The claim seems pretty accurate. An AMS 700 LGX does, in fact, make your dick bigger.



If that image isn't reasonable this should be: https://www.bostonscientific.com/conten ... ochure.pdf