FrankTalk.org

Someone have an idea about this cut? Thx u


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gkFDQvUk5nI

I'd be concerned them cutting so near the underside of the glans seems like there is a lot of nerves in that area .. and once cut do not always come back or come back as sensitive as they once were ...

easymoney wrote:I'd be concerned them cutting so near the underside of the glans seems like there is a lot of nerves in that area .. and once cut do not always come back or come back as sensitive as they once were ...

I thinked about nerves and blood in that part too. Seem for this they asking cheap but looking this im dubious if do it or not

Anyone know how is this surgery called? I know have infrapubic and penoscrotal but this one you experts know how is called?

Marochko wrote:Anyone know how is this surgery called? I know have infrapubic and penoscrotal but this one you experts know how is called?

its called subcoronal incision. Often done trough the circumsision-scar. Has advantages but only in certain cases.

Thx a lot for the info

[b]Had a friend ..failed IPP .. replacement failed .. they put one rod of a mallabble in for 6 months ..he wanted it out ..they cut right about there to remove the rod instead of where the rod was inserted .

Thx for update, your friend have problem with gland??

No had implant fail .. did not go to original dr travel was too far went to a dr. his uro recommended .. guy butchered him ..went back to original dr. .. he is famous for salvaging other dr's fuck ups .. was so damaged and tore up nothing he could do but remove all and put a rod in to hold the length and try to let it heal ..6-7 months later he said fuck it take it out stick a fork in me I'm done...lol

The sub-coronal incision technique has its pros and cons. Here's some from a research published in Sexual Medicine Journal (2020 Otero et al)

The good
(1) Excellent visibility of corpora cavernosa and urethra
(2) Additional surgical reconstructive procedures (Peyro-nie’s, esthetic enhancements) can be easily performed
(3) Similar to IP, time to pump activation is quicker and reservoir insertion easier
(4) Particularly suited to local anesthesia because of the unhampered visual field after the anesthetic injection and less postoperative pain
(5) Wilson believes reservoir placement seems as easy as IP and pump placement as easy as SC.
(6) Optimal cosmetic result with a single incision

The bad
(1) Relatively recent introduction limits the number of studies regarding this surgical approach and the follow-up time of patients.
(2) Requires more operative time than IP or PS
(3) The SC access requires degloving of the penis, therefore, complications such as sensorineural altera­tions, skin loss, glans necrosis, and lymphedema are rare but reported