FrankTalk.org

on Tuesday I will do my revision from titan to ams cx, according to your experience, even those who directly put a cx, without any revision, in your opinion, I should expect a loss of girth/length, I should expect a much lower stiffness, an angle better/worse, I should expect more ovality or more flattening than the titan, my titan was already very oval and flat what do you think based on your experience

You ste jumping to conclusions. I was implanted by Dr. Clavell in January with aN AMS-LGX. I just can't imagine how anything could be much harder. It is like a steel rod when pumped to the max. I didn't lose any length or girth maybe even gained a bit. It is not perfectly round, however not far from it. I am very happy with the outcome. Think positive. The key to a great outcome is the surgeon. Just go with the best high volume surgeon you can find.
Alan

This isn't my personal experience, but it reflects the average axial rigidity data in grams from 100 patients who have undergone implantation with various models.

Wishing you the best of luck with your surgery!

Please keep us updated on your progress. I’m sure you'll do great.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24085236/

Al Ansari A, Talib RA, Canguven O, Shamsodini A. Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Sep 26;85(3):138-42. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.138. PMID: 24085236.

A 248 patient study that provides interesting insights.

There were more patients satisfied with the 700CX™ (P = 0.0001).....

It seems that group 700CX™ would recommend to re-implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency....

Partner Satisfaction:
It seems that although both groups would “strongly” recommend to their partners to re-implant the PP, it seems there is a greater tendency that group 700CX™ would recommend it more than group Titan® with 69% versus 56%, respectively.

https://journals.lww.com/ajandrology/fu ... on.10.aspx

Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses


Otero, Javier Romero1,; Cruz, César Rojas2; Gómez, Borja García1; Geli, Joaquim Sarquella2; Polo, Jose Medina1; Castañé, Eduard Ruiz2; Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez1

Asian Journal of Andrology 19(3):p 321-325, May–Jun 2017. | DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.172822

alans4570 wrote:You ste jumping to conclusions. I was implanted by Dr. Clavell in January with aN AMS-LGX. I just can't imagine how anything could be much harder. It is like a steel rod when pumped to the max. I didn't lose any length or girth maybe even gained a bit. It is not perfectly round, however not far from it. I am very happy with the outcome. Think positive. The key to a great outcome is the surgeon. Just go with the best high volume surgeon you can find.
Alan

based on what I have read here, it seems that the titan is the most rigid in terms of erection, I have also read a lot of users who are very happy with their ams cx, but few details such as roundness or loss/gain of length/circumference

Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.

LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.

LastHope you are very kind to post this data for me, unfortunately I can't understand because of the language, it doesn't even let me copy, to paste into the translator, could you explain what it says

LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.

Great news Mom! I got that job I was telling you about with that doctor doing medical device testing. My degree is finally paying off, thanks for your emotional and financial support for the past 16 years, this will be great experience!

What is it you're testing honey? I'm so proud of you! I'm sure it'll be a great contribution to society and help millions of people.

Well, I'm gathering data on how much force is needed for all sorts of different penis implants to penetrate a vagina, and then testing the force needed to enter an anus.

frank66665 wrote:

LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.

LastHope you are very kind to post this data for me, unfortunately I can't understand because of the language, it doesn't even let me copy, to paste into the translator, could you explain what it says

You're welcome, Frank! Here are the numbers. I wrote down the averages instead of the ranges for simplicity.

Average penetration forces (in Newtons):
Vaginal - 7.85 N
Anal - 30.26 N

Average forces recorded when device buckled:
Coloplast Titan Classic - 10.47 N
AMS CX 700 - 9.66 N
Coloplast Titan OTR - 9.35 N
Coloplast Genesis (Malleable) - 8.40 N

A well-lubricated machine buckles less, so some of us must grease it up and glide through the day and night!

Jage64 wrote:

LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.

Great news Mom! I got that job I was telling you about with that doctor doing medical device testing. My degree is finally paying off, thanks for your emotional and financial support for the past 16 years, this will be great experience!

What is it you're testing honey? I'm so proud of you! I'm sure it'll be a great contribution to society and help millions of people.

Well, I'm gathering data on how much force is needed for all sorts of different penis implants to penetrate a vagina, and then testing the force needed to enter an anus.

That's funny

Let's call it IIPIS!

IIPIS - Insurance Institute for Penile Implant Safety
IIPIS is an independent, nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing penile implant buckling, leaks, auto-inflation, infection, erosion and extrusion, through research and education of surgeons, patients, policymakers and device safety professionals. IIPIS prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.