Need Input on Surgeon and Model
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2024 10:26 am
Hi everyone,
I'm preparing for an implant surgery and need to decide on both the surgeon and the implant model. My choices for surgeons are Dr. Eid and Dr. Clavell, and for implants, I'm considering either the AMS CX or the Titan with the Classic Pump.
I've spent a lot of time reading on this forum and have consulted with both surgeons. I'd like to share my measurements, their advice, my concerns, and ultimately seek input from the community on what you think.
My Measurements:
Flaccid, my penis measures 4 inches in girth and between 3.5 and 4.5 inches in length, making it relatively thin. Both Dr. Clavell and Dr. Eid pointed this out. When erect, my girth is 4.5 inches and my length (bone-pressed) is 6.5 inches.
Surgeons' Recommendations:
Both Dr. Eid and Dr. Clavell agree that, given my girth, I’m a good candidate for the AMS implant. I’ve had concerns about the Titan after reading various accounts of discomfort in the flaccid state (e.g., "dog ears"), but Dr. Clavell advised me to take those experiences with a grain of salt. He explained that online forums like FT tend to highlight negative experiences, as people with positive outcomes are often out living their lives. That perspective makes sense to me. Dr. Clavell mentioned he’s only had one patient so uncomfortable with the Titan that they requested a replacement. He believes the concerns are likely overstated, and that I probably wouldn’t have significant issues with the Titan. However, he also noted that I’m still a good candidate for AMS and left the final choice up to me.
Dr. Eid, on the other hand, favors the Titan Classic but said he could order the AMS CX for me, either with the MS Pump or the new Tenacio Pump. He cautioned that the Titan’s thicker cylinders could compress my penile tissues over time, leading to distension of my tunica albuginea (the fibrous tissue around the penis). This could reduce blood flow and possibly cause weaker erections in the future. Dr. Clavell, however, downplayed this concern, noting that tissue compression would only occur during inflation, and any distension could be repaired if necessary. Dr. Eid also mentioned that the Titan Classic’s pump has a squeak, which could be a problem for keeping it discreet, which is a significant concern for me.
Concern - Scar Capsule Formation:
One major consideration for me is the formation of the scar capsule around the implant, as this will define my size for future implants. I didn't really see this as a significant concern until I spoke to Dr. Clavell. Apparently with the AMS, there’s a real risk that the scar capsule could impact erection rigidity, both now and with future implants. Dr. Clavell shared that AMS implants can sometimes feel rock-hard right after surgery but lose some of that rigidity during follow-up appointments. He believes this could be due to the AMS CX cylinders being too weak to properly expand the scar capsule as it forms, which worries me. If the scar capsule forms and limits the expansion, it could result in weaker erections, even with a Titan implant later on. The Titan’s stronger cylinders, however, don’t seem to have this issue when used as the first implant.
This scar capsule concern makes me think that choosing the AMS, particularly without an early cycling protocol to expand the forming capsule, could be a mistake. Ironically, if I do choose the AMS, it might be better to go with Dr. Eid, even though he’s known for his work with the Titan, because he starts cycling earlier—on the third day.
My Questions:
1. AMS or Titan?
I’m leaning toward the AMS for its comfort, better concealability when flaccid, and the quieter pump. Additionally, it puts less pressure on my thinner penile tissues due to its narrower cylinders. However, if this comes with the risk of weaker erections both now and in the future, I’m more inclined to go with the Titan as my first implant.
2. Eid or Clavell?
The implant choice heavily influences my decision on the surgeon. I like Dr. Clavell’s approach to pain management and the fact that he doesn't use a catheter. He’s also younger, though I don’t see Dr. Eid’s age as a major factor. However, if I choose the AMS, there’s the risk of weaker erections that Dr. Clavell mentioned. Dr. Eid’s earlier cycling protocol could help with that. On the other hand, Dr. Eid is renowned for his work with the Titan, so would it make sense to go with him for an AMS implant, considering he likely performs fewer AMS surgeries?
Let me know what your thoughts are. Thank you.
I'm preparing for an implant surgery and need to decide on both the surgeon and the implant model. My choices for surgeons are Dr. Eid and Dr. Clavell, and for implants, I'm considering either the AMS CX or the Titan with the Classic Pump.
I've spent a lot of time reading on this forum and have consulted with both surgeons. I'd like to share my measurements, their advice, my concerns, and ultimately seek input from the community on what you think.
My Measurements:
Flaccid, my penis measures 4 inches in girth and between 3.5 and 4.5 inches in length, making it relatively thin. Both Dr. Clavell and Dr. Eid pointed this out. When erect, my girth is 4.5 inches and my length (bone-pressed) is 6.5 inches.
Surgeons' Recommendations:
Both Dr. Eid and Dr. Clavell agree that, given my girth, I’m a good candidate for the AMS implant. I’ve had concerns about the Titan after reading various accounts of discomfort in the flaccid state (e.g., "dog ears"), but Dr. Clavell advised me to take those experiences with a grain of salt. He explained that online forums like FT tend to highlight negative experiences, as people with positive outcomes are often out living their lives. That perspective makes sense to me. Dr. Clavell mentioned he’s only had one patient so uncomfortable with the Titan that they requested a replacement. He believes the concerns are likely overstated, and that I probably wouldn’t have significant issues with the Titan. However, he also noted that I’m still a good candidate for AMS and left the final choice up to me.
Dr. Eid, on the other hand, favors the Titan Classic but said he could order the AMS CX for me, either with the MS Pump or the new Tenacio Pump. He cautioned that the Titan’s thicker cylinders could compress my penile tissues over time, leading to distension of my tunica albuginea (the fibrous tissue around the penis). This could reduce blood flow and possibly cause weaker erections in the future. Dr. Clavell, however, downplayed this concern, noting that tissue compression would only occur during inflation, and any distension could be repaired if necessary. Dr. Eid also mentioned that the Titan Classic’s pump has a squeak, which could be a problem for keeping it discreet, which is a significant concern for me.
Concern - Scar Capsule Formation:
One major consideration for me is the formation of the scar capsule around the implant, as this will define my size for future implants. I didn't really see this as a significant concern until I spoke to Dr. Clavell. Apparently with the AMS, there’s a real risk that the scar capsule could impact erection rigidity, both now and with future implants. Dr. Clavell shared that AMS implants can sometimes feel rock-hard right after surgery but lose some of that rigidity during follow-up appointments. He believes this could be due to the AMS CX cylinders being too weak to properly expand the scar capsule as it forms, which worries me. If the scar capsule forms and limits the expansion, it could result in weaker erections, even with a Titan implant later on. The Titan’s stronger cylinders, however, don’t seem to have this issue when used as the first implant.
This scar capsule concern makes me think that choosing the AMS, particularly without an early cycling protocol to expand the forming capsule, could be a mistake. Ironically, if I do choose the AMS, it might be better to go with Dr. Eid, even though he’s known for his work with the Titan, because he starts cycling earlier—on the third day.
My Questions:
1. AMS or Titan?
I’m leaning toward the AMS for its comfort, better concealability when flaccid, and the quieter pump. Additionally, it puts less pressure on my thinner penile tissues due to its narrower cylinders. However, if this comes with the risk of weaker erections both now and in the future, I’m more inclined to go with the Titan as my first implant.
2. Eid or Clavell?
The implant choice heavily influences my decision on the surgeon. I like Dr. Clavell’s approach to pain management and the fact that he doesn't use a catheter. He’s also younger, though I don’t see Dr. Eid’s age as a major factor. However, if I choose the AMS, there’s the risk of weaker erections that Dr. Clavell mentioned. Dr. Eid’s earlier cycling protocol could help with that. On the other hand, Dr. Eid is renowned for his work with the Titan, so would it make sense to go with him for an AMS implant, considering he likely performs fewer AMS surgeries?
Let me know what your thoughts are. Thank you.