Regarding RTE's/Boston vs. Coloplast/Surgen technique

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.



thx1138
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2022 9:20 pm

Regarding RTE's/Boston vs. Coloplast/Surgen technique

Postby thx1138 » Wed Jan 01, 2025 5:52 pm

Maybe it's me but it is my impression that Boston implanters use more RTE's than Coloplast implanters.

With the Boston implanters; it seems RTE+3 is relatively common vs. Coclopast implanters.

The record for the Boston that I can recall is RTE+5. I don't seem to notice as much RTE usage with Coloplast.

Does anyone else have a similar impression ? Why would that be ?

newbie443
Posts: 1958
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:41 pm
Location: Sedgwick county, Kansas USA

Re: Regarding RTE's/Boston vs. Coloplast/Surgen technique

Postby newbie443 » Wed Jan 01, 2025 11:08 pm

thx1138 wrote:Maybe it's me but it is my impression that Boston implanters use more RTE's than Coloplast implanters.

With the Boston implanters; it seems RTE+3 is relatively common vs. Coclopast implanters.

The record for the Boston that I can recall is RTE+5. I don't seem to notice as much RTE usage with Coloplast.

Does anyone else have a similar impression ? Why would that be ?


Coloplast cylinders are made in 2cm increments. Whereas BS are only available in 3cm increments.
Injections failed. Implanted 3-21-18 AMS 700 LGX 21 + 1 RTE 100 cc reservoir 6.5" L 5" G Dr. Kramer.

Proximal Perforation Sling Repair 4/13/21 Dr. Broghammer

67 years young.

Will show and tell and talk with others.

Gt1956
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 2:47 pm

Re: Regarding RTE's/Boston vs. Coloplast/Surgen technique

Postby Gt1956 » Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:31 am

newbie443 wrote:
thx1138 wrote:Maybe it's me but it is my impression that Boston implanters use more RTE's than Coloplast implanters.
With the Boston implanters; it seems RTE+3 is relatively common vs. Coclopast implanters.
The record for the Boston that I can recall is RTE+5. I don't seem to notice as much RTE usage with Coloplast.
Does anyone else have a similar impression ? Why would that be ?

Coloplast cylinders are made in 2cm increments. Whereas BS are only available in 3cm increments.

Folks, Newbie443 gives us the real reason. Why do people think RTE's are bad? They are how drs fine tune the cylinder size to more closely match your penis length. How would you like measuring 20cm and having an 18cm implant installed. That would lead to major floppy glans.
69yo, HBP @ 40, high triglycerides @ 45. Phimosis @ 57. Type 2 @ 60. Dr. William Brant May 1, 2023 CX 21cm w/no rte's penoscrotal 6" girth @ 6 months.

Taggart423
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2024 5:51 pm

Re: Regarding RTE's/Boston vs. Coloplast/Surgen technique

Postby Taggart423 » Thu Jan 02, 2025 4:02 am

Dr. Clavell has a good video that explains RTE's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqumJs7mxfE
61 years old,T2 since 2008, ED since 2010. Pills have stopped working and not interested in shots. Implanted 11/20/2024 by Dr. Calvell with AMS 700 CX 21cm+1cm RTE

equusAz
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon May 22, 2023 9:16 am

Re: Regarding RTE's/Boston vs. Coloplast/Surgen technique

Postby equusAz » Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:35 am

newbie443 wrote:
thx1138 wrote:Maybe it's me but it is my impression that Boston implanters use more RTE's than Coloplast implanters.

With the Boston implanters; it seems RTE+3 is relatively common vs. Coclopast implanters.

The record for the Boston that I can recall is RTE+5. I don't seem to notice as much RTE usage with Coloplast.

Does anyone else have a similar impression ? Why would that be ?


Coloplast cylinders are made in 2cm increments. Whereas BS are only available in 3cm increments.


Well....do remember that there are more models with Boston than JUST the LGX. I've seen a lot of 18cm+3rte for the LGX - probably because that ends up being a 'one size fits most' kind of thing. When it comes to non length increase implants there is going to be a LOT more variation - especially with Boston due to the 3cm length difference between sizes.
48yo gay married male - Size before cancer / ED = 7.5" x 6.25" (current 5.5x5.2). AMS 700 CX implanted 12/9/24. 18cm + 1cm RTE and 18cm + 2cm RTE.
Implant Journal: https://www.franktalk.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=25158


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fordawin, Google [Bot], JohnDoe, newbie443 and 24 guests