In the mail

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
alibaba
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:04 pm

In the mail

Postby alibaba » Wed Apr 06, 2016 1:02 am

After complaining about the lack of office visit notes in my record seeing Lavine at Rush University I received a revised copy in the mail 4/4/16. Instead of stating "not documented" as in the record I had before, it had the 'doctors notes". First it stated he was "pleased to find he could pump it up without taking 300 pumps" . First time that happened but I'll give him that. Then stated that he was certain it would not be possible to regain the length and girth lost getting the implant. Further stated that the tubing and reservoir could be repositioned with revision surgery at some further point if I felt it continued to give me issues that I could not learn to live with. The last point was the oddest one out of the bunch. It claims he suggested I try using a traction device on it to try to regain the lost length. I never heard any mention of that. I asked my wife and she said he never said 1 word about a traction device. I have a rather nice traction device from when I was trying to regain some of the loss after the prostatectomy. I see NO possible to way to use this thing on my penis because the base would press down on all that DAMNED@%^#^$^&^#$& tubing wad and hurt like hell. Anything that presses on the wad of tubing hurts including stiffening it from pumping it or pressing on the tubes where they go into the top side of the penis cavernosas. Beside that the skin is too damned sore to pull on it and the glans is now smaller than the shaft since it is softer than a marshmallow so there literally is nothing to pull against. The damn thing could not stay on unless I nailed it to my dick. I continue to be flabbergasted by each new fiction these doctors come up with.

Before any of you start in this is more of my bullshit, any of you naysayers want to see the actual record that he suggested a traction device, PM me your email and I will scan it and send as proof.
LGX 21cm .Milam 01/13/16. Horror; both service and surgical outcome. hated infrapubic installation. Kramer revision 03/01/17. 22cm Titan +1.5cm extender. Those who think their opinion is the only one that matters are a danger to themselves and others.

palace01
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:33 pm

Re: In the mail

Postby palace01 » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:10 am

Alibaba,
Totally by coincidence, just today, I came across this article that discusses revision of implant surgery to increase length beginning with 'traction' followed by new implant
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21091884
Age 73
Apr-15-14. RP-Pills, Injections No help. VED(almost old size in tube).
Feb-12-16, Dr Cornell, AMS-CX "18+4" LOTS PROBLEMS!
Jul-6-16 Dr Khera ColoPlast "20+1" Very Unhappy with very short length/width but Dr insists correct


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asecondtobreak2, brisy41, Mark1974 and 132 guests