Advice for Revision Model, Currently Have AMS 700 CX
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 10:59 pm
My AMS 700 CX device is leaking or leaked and needs replacing. I am disappointed that the AMS device failed so quickly. I was just implanted in Sep 2014. I have two goals in mind:
first) to replace it with a working model, and
second) to regain the length I lost.
Any suggestions on a model to replace the CX?
I have heard people say the AMS 700 LGX was a good option for them, but what about folks switching to a Coloplast Titan?
Here are the details of my personal experience:
In September of 2014, I had an AMS 700 CX implanted by Dr. Andrew Kramer. His student doctor measured me as 14cm in length with a stretched, flaccid penis prior to surgery. Dr. Kramer implanted a 21cm device with 1cm rear tips. The procedure was uneventful. I had 10 cm erection length in October 2014 after I was "activated" following the procedure. Through a daily cycling of the device for about 12 months, it eventually elongated to 12 cm.
Then in February 2016, the pump collapsed after about 10 pumps and the device was not fully erect. Kaiser (my regular medical provider) performed a CT scan in late March 2016. At an appointment with my regular urologist, he reviewed the CT scan. He said the reservoir was out of fluid and speculated it had leaked, or was slowly leaking. As such, he said it would likely require a full replacement, revision surgery. He recommended that I see Dr. Kramer for a second opinion. The Kaiser urologist also recommended that I have a high-volume surgeon do the revision, such as Dr. Kramer.
I saw Dr. Kramer today (5/3/2016). He reviewed the CT scans before the appointment, then examined me, and then cycled the device about six times. His professional opinion is that the device is defective and has leaked.
- The reservoir level shown in the CT scan while the penis was erect was very low/collapsed.
- He estimates the device was about 40 percent full when all the saline was pumped into the penis out of the reservoir. He said normally the system has plenty, like twice as much, fluid than is needed to operate the cylinders.
The likely scenario is that the device leaked near the pump along the three tube lines (the most common occurrence), according to Dr. Kramer's experience. Dr. Kramer said he will notify AMS of the defect and said there is a life-time warranty on AMS devices. As such, I should receive a new device free of charge from AMS for the replacement surgery.
Any advice on the forthcoming revision surgery on maintaining or regaining the length I had prior to surgery, satisfaction between AMS 700 CX and other devices you may have had are greatly appreciated.
first) to replace it with a working model, and
second) to regain the length I lost.
Any suggestions on a model to replace the CX?
I have heard people say the AMS 700 LGX was a good option for them, but what about folks switching to a Coloplast Titan?
Here are the details of my personal experience:
In September of 2014, I had an AMS 700 CX implanted by Dr. Andrew Kramer. His student doctor measured me as 14cm in length with a stretched, flaccid penis prior to surgery. Dr. Kramer implanted a 21cm device with 1cm rear tips. The procedure was uneventful. I had 10 cm erection length in October 2014 after I was "activated" following the procedure. Through a daily cycling of the device for about 12 months, it eventually elongated to 12 cm.
Then in February 2016, the pump collapsed after about 10 pumps and the device was not fully erect. Kaiser (my regular medical provider) performed a CT scan in late March 2016. At an appointment with my regular urologist, he reviewed the CT scan. He said the reservoir was out of fluid and speculated it had leaked, or was slowly leaking. As such, he said it would likely require a full replacement, revision surgery. He recommended that I see Dr. Kramer for a second opinion. The Kaiser urologist also recommended that I have a high-volume surgeon do the revision, such as Dr. Kramer.
I saw Dr. Kramer today (5/3/2016). He reviewed the CT scans before the appointment, then examined me, and then cycled the device about six times. His professional opinion is that the device is defective and has leaked.
- The reservoir level shown in the CT scan while the penis was erect was very low/collapsed.
- He estimates the device was about 40 percent full when all the saline was pumped into the penis out of the reservoir. He said normally the system has plenty, like twice as much, fluid than is needed to operate the cylinders.
The likely scenario is that the device leaked near the pump along the three tube lines (the most common occurrence), according to Dr. Kramer's experience. Dr. Kramer said he will notify AMS of the defect and said there is a life-time warranty on AMS devices. As such, I should receive a new device free of charge from AMS for the replacement surgery.
Any advice on the forthcoming revision surgery on maintaining or regaining the length I had prior to surgery, satisfaction between AMS 700 CX and other devices you may have had are greatly appreciated.