Page 1 of 1

No RTEs but penis tip not pointing to 2 o'clock?

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:40 am
by strongagain
Who of you is with zero RTEs but the tip of the penis is NOT pointing to 2 o'clock or beyond?

Some say that the penis is 'drooping' because of RTEs. I just wonder whether this 100% correct. In my opinion it has mainly to do with the pelvic muscles.

Re: No RTEs but penis tip not pointing to 2 o'clock?

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:06 am
by FlaDon
No RTE's here, and I don't point to 2 o'clock. It's rather at about 3 o'clock, but I haven't pointed to the sky in YEARS! When I was in my 20's it was almost straight up....almost against my stomach. But that faded over the years even before ED. So now, with the implant, it gets as hard as it did when I was young, it just doesn't point up anymore. However, I'm very happy with it the way it is, and feel the direction it points is a non-issue.

Re: No RTEs but penis tip not pointing to 2 o'clock?

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:25 pm
by Donnie1954
RTE's 5.5cm but erection is tall and proud at 3:00. No hinge. So easy to totally deflate w no back fill. :P

Re: No RTEs but penis tip not pointing to 2 o'clock?

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 7:11 pm
by merrix
strongagain wrote:Who of you is with zero RTEs but the tip of the penis is NOT pointing to 2 o'clock or beyond?

Some say that the penis is 'drooping' because of RTEs. I just wonder whether this 100% correct. In my opinion it has mainly to do with the pelvic muscles.



Since I am one of the 'some' above, let me clarify what I really mean:

An implant, its function and cosmetical result is a complex issue affected by many, many variables. I don't mean that 100% of all bionic dicks without RTEs have less hinge, less wobbling, and better angle than 100% of all bionic dicks with RTEs.
Just as I don't mean that every Titan w/o RTE will have better pump placement than every AMS w/o RTE.
Or that all same size erect dicks with LGX will have smaller flaccids than same sized erect CX or Titans.
Not that simple.
There are many other variables. Patient''s anatomy, doc's performance, residual blood flow, time elapsed since implanted, etc, etc.

What I do mean is that all else equal, after some time, the longer the RTEs, the more the implant will wobble or hinge than it would have w/o. Result can still be great though.
It is just one factor among others, some with major impact, and some with minor impact, deciding the end result.
Which means that most importantly is to get a doc who gets it right. Right sizing, no messed up tubing, no infection etc.

Angle by the way is for sure heavily affected by your own anatomy as well. Can be a huge difference between two individuals. To say something about RTEs impact on the angle, one cannot take two random guys, one with and one without RTEs, and draw conclusions about everyone. But all things equal, the same guy would probably have had a better angle 5 years after implant w/o RTEs than he would with RTEs.

And to answer your question:
I have no RTEs, I am 11 months out, and my angle is the same 2:00-2:30 as it was pre-implant.