Page 1 of 3
Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:46 am
by merrix
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:34 am
by LMCatman
I've had both... The IP, my revision, turned out much better, probably during to the skill of the surgeon...... Thank you Dr Perito!!!
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:01 am
by Donnie1954
Thanks Merrix,
I am more at ease about having the infra pubic.
Donnie
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:31 am
by dg_moore
ddbryan1972 wrote:Thanks Merrix,
I am more at ease about having the infra pubic.
Donnie
That's interesting. The article lists more cons than pros for infra as compared with scrotal.
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:55 am
by Donnie1954
I choose to dwell on the pro's. What's done is done.
The cup is half full not half empty.
Donnie
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:46 pm
by alibaba
Last portion of article states they usually remove an infrapubic through another infrapubic, then reimplant it scrotally.
Dr. Kramer is quite good at removing infrapubic through the scrotal incision. Watch his videos. The simplicity he does it makes complete sense and is quick.
The increased risk of nerve damage is eliminated. I think my lack of feeling in my penis is nerve damage from surgery or pressure on them from that damned tubing.
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:56 pm
by ccrider
dg_moore wrote:ddbryan1972 wrote:Thanks Merrix,
I am more at ease about having the infra pubic.
Donnie
That's interesting. The article lists more cons than pros for infra as compared with scrotal.
Obviously I'm not a surgeon, but after reading up on both approaches/watching videos etc, it would seem to me from a logical perspective that a surgeon could get more precise measurements & better pump placement using the scrotal approach versus infrapubic. I think there are many skilled surgeons who swear by the infrapubic approach...Perito and others. But I have to say that if you visit Frank Talk on a regular basis, it would appear that most problems & subsequent revisions are connected to an initial infrapubic surgery versus scrotal. I mentioned this to Dr. Kramer-that the scrotal approach which he uses seems to be be a more logical/accurate way to install the prosthesis-and asked why a surgeon would do it any other way barring some medical indication to the contrary. He told me that the infrapubic approach is easier for the surgeon...
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:02 pm
by Donnie1954
I had infra pubic and I lost nothing. No loss in length or sensitivity. Maybe I am one of the exceptions.
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:32 pm
by strongagain
According to Dr. Eid "infrapubic is only good for the surgeon".
Re: Article on infra pubic vs scrotal
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 2:59 pm
by Donnie1954
That is a stupid callous remark that should never been made by 'someone' who thinks he is the ''ultimate authority' on penal implants. His 'ego' is going to bite him!
Donnie