merrix wrote:I neither like nor dislike it. In some way, I don't give a shit. I can get my implant as hard as I want and I know what it takes to get there. So in some way, this post, as many others here, doesn't really matter to anyone.
This is just kind of interesting. How is it possible that you claim two doctors say something that I think I can easily prove wrong? What is the catch here?
Oh, yes. One should never let facts get in the way of provable truth.
merrix wrote:One thing is that you say he said "to get to max erection". That doesn't necessarily mean pumping till the pump cannot be squeezed anymore. Max erection is maybe for him to pump till the point where he sees that the dick gets full, all crinkles are gone, etc. That could be the explanation.
(edited for brevity)
Till then, I keep saying your docs are either full of BS, or we have something else messing things up here which none of us has thought of.
They might not be wrong. You just mentioned one of the possible explanations that I posted yesterday. A difference in the degree of inflation considered to be "max erection".
merrix wrote:(edited for focus and brevity)
Ask them some questions to poke holes in their story then. (Or to explain where I go wrong.)
Ask them if it is correct that a pump contains 2.5 cc.
If so, tell them that in that case all the saline they can move with 17 pumps is 43 cc.
If so, ask them why there are 125 cc Coloplast reservoirs on the market.
Ask them if they have ever installed one sinlge reservoir larger than the smallest size.
If so, why? Because then their story just doesn't make sense...
.
Merrix, have you thought of asking your Patient Liaison these questions? Also, no matter how voluminous the pump bulb is, how much volume can be transferred when squeezing that bulb inside a human scrotum. I doubt it is 100%.