AMS 700 CX vs LGX

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
jisherwood
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 11:41 am

AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby jisherwood » Sun Oct 27, 2019 10:38 am

How many guys implanted with with a AMS 700 CX wish they were implanted with the AMS 700 LGX? I was hoping for the LGX but doctor used his Discretion to implant with CX. I mentioned I would prefer the LGX but he said put my trust in his skills to know which one will work the best. Don't get me wrong I am very happy with my implant but just wish i had more girth than I have.
64yrs, nerve sparring surgery Dec'17, neobladder with prostate removal because of bladder cancer, gave up on trimix, became bionic with AMS 700 CX June 2019. :ugeek:

notaes
Posts: 523
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:54 am

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby notaes » Sun Oct 27, 2019 12:51 pm

I am scheduled for implant surgery in a January and my mind is already toying with me about losing inches in length and girth. I have lost 3/4 inch in length this past year. Does everyone lose length when the are implanted? If so why? Can anyone explain why you lose length? I have always had a nice size dick. Gifted in both length and girth! Losing just 3/4 inch this year I can tell has really worked on me mentally. I will just be happy with a dick they gets rock hard that I can use without having to inject anything whenever I want. I appreciate any feedback you guys can give me on this length issue. I will adapt to whatever and be thankful.
.
66 yr old male married 36 yrs use trimix four yrs, cilais and Viagra. trimix work well developed scarring on both sides had implant 1/9/2020 at UT Med Ctr, Knoxville, TN Dr. John Lacy.

notaes
Posts: 523
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:54 am

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby notaes » Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:01 pm

P. S. I meant to add that my surgeons implant of choice is the AMS 700. I too would prefer the LGX but cannot tell the surgeon what to do. He already knows I want all the dick he can help me to have! He understands guys. I ask him this week during my consult if he pushed the envelope to help guys have all the dick they could have? He answer was yes because he had never had a guy come in and ask for a smaller dick. My response was right on! I feel good about him doing my surgery!
66 yr old male married 36 yrs use trimix four yrs, cilais and Viagra. trimix work well developed scarring on both sides had implant 1/9/2020 at UT Med Ctr, Knoxville, TN Dr. John Lacy.

cmforbsc
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 4:10 pm
Location: Mesa, AZ

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby cmforbsc » Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm

I have the AMS700 and have never looked back or questioned the doctor's choice! I have NOT noticed any change in length or girth and am so happy, I don't think losing anything in either size would affect my outcome. So pleased am I that I love talking to men and couples about what a difference being able please my partner has made.
80 in Arizona with AMS 700 implant in April of 2014 Dr. Wayne Kuang of Alb, NM. (my hero) Tried Pills, Vacuum Pump and no way was I going to stick a needle in my penis. One happy camper now.

ft8790
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2019 10:21 am

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby ft8790 » Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:40 pm

There is a Urologist that has a radio show 1-2PM Monday and Tuesday. You can call and ask those questions, he says he's done thousand of implants.
I've called in and got right in 281-558-5738
53 years old, tumors both sides of prostate treated with HIFU May 2019 current ED using cialis and viagra not very effective, recently divorced concerned on trying to move forward with ED issue

marlow13
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun May 20, 2018 8:34 pm

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby marlow13 » Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:54 pm

My surgeon initially said he was going to use the AMS 700 LGX, but he said I was longer than he thought so I was implanted with a 21 CM CX + 2 RTE’s. 21 to 23 CM seems to be the magic number from what I’ve read. Anything over 21 CM will need to be more sturdy like a Coldplast Titan. My surgeon said that using the LGX at my length would make it unstable and subject to fold during penetration. I thought he was full of shit at first then I started to read up on it and it’s a typical surgical adjustment when using AMS devices. The CX is more sturdy like the Titan. I’m
Only a month and 21 days from my procedure. I keep hearing it will get better so I’m trying to be patient.
58 y/o PCA 18 on March 2017. Biopsy 8.6 Gleason. Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer June 2017. Robotic Prostectomy Aug 2017. .02 at Follow ups so far. Implanted on 9/6/19 with AMS 700 CX 21+2 RTE's by Dr.Dean Knoll Urology Associates Nashville, TN.

tomas1
Posts: 2003
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:12 pm
Location: Tempe, AZ

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby tomas1 » Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:54 pm

My surgeon claimed (mistakenly imo) that cylinders 18cm and longer would be unstable.
He put in the CX and I actually don't like it (yet).

It works fine, but I have a persistent dog ear that worries me.
Last edited by tomas1 on Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
86 years
Inject testosterone weekly.
Implant on 1/22/19 by Dr Avila.
Scrotal, hor. incision just over 1"
18cm AMS 700 CX, 3.5cm RTE 100cc res
Gleason 6 prostate cancer. Monitoring it for now.
Update: On my last biopsies the cancer wasn't found.

David_R
Posts: 2145
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:03 pm

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby David_R » Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:00 am

ft8790 wrote:There is a Urologist that has a radio show 1-2PM Monday and Tuesday. You can call and ask those questions, he says he's done thousand of implants.

Talking on the air about your penis and penile implants? Not me! :shock:

FreddyFree
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:43 pm

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby FreddyFree » Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:11 am

Yes, I wanted the LGX but surgeon implanted CX. He said I needed it because of the extent of Peyronie’s disease.

Interesting comments about folding of AMS longer than 21cms. I ended up losing an inch in both length and girth. My wife notices the difference in size, yet loves the fact it is the Energizer Bunny. Not as furry though!
AMS 700 CX 18cm. x 12mm. With 3cm. RTEs. 10/10/18

postra7777
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:10 pm

Re: AMS 700 CX vs LGX

Postby postra7777 » Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:18 am

Same thing happened to me. Wanted the LGX but got the CX. From what I understand is the CX gives you more girth than the LGX and if they get the length correct you have just the same amount of length as you would the LGX. I too would have liked more girth, however my Dr. tells me neither the LGX nor the CX would have made any difference. I would have needed to go to the Titan. I didn't go with the Titan due to the fact that your flaccid length is your erect length. It's hard enough to hide the CX now. I boat and swim a lot so I'm always aware try not to show too much.
Suffered with ED for most of my life. Viagra then to Trimix then implanted 3/8/2018 with AMX 700 CX 21cm with 1cm RTE. 50 years old Urolift procedure performed 30 day prior to my implant surgery.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Markc2008, stmfttr and 312 guests