New AMS 700 LGX - Growth Potential

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
LuisFernandez
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:45 pm

Re: New AMS 700 LGX - Growth Potential

Postby LuisFernandez » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:26 am

AST2123 wrote:The tubing is connected to the end of the cylinders, which I believe would fit the outer side of penis. If the doctor uses 22"+ 1 RTE, the tubing will be connected deep near the crus. That is why the length of RTEs is based on how deep the crus is.


According to this study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6358419/ a Titan device has 5cm of non inflatable cylinders - without any RTEs.

It would seem that these devices were designed to be installed without any RTEs, so i doubt that RTEs has a positive effect on tubing placement.
Born 1986. ED. Peyronie's.
Considering an Implant. Consulting with Dr. Eid.
Using Cialis 10mg/day + 20mg for sex. Injections of PGE-1.
See my story: viewtopic.php?t=15016

LeRoastBeef
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:09 am

Re: New AMS 700 LGX - Growth Potential

Postby LeRoastBeef » Tue Sep 28, 2021 2:33 am

Assuming a deep crux : The fewer rte's used, the deeper into the crux the tubing origin (from the cylinders) will be.
The issue that can crop up here, is that the tubing will have to travel further along to the corporotomy while nestled been the cylinders and tunica/crux.

The tubing running along this interface can result in greater resistance to saline moving along the tubing during inflation and deflation, especially as the pressure, thus diameter of cylinders, thus pressure on tubing increases. You end up squeezing the tubes between cylinders and tunica /crux.

It can even limit the degree to which the cylinders can inflate if bad enough.

Use more rte's, move tubing origin point forwards (more distal) , tubing origin point now at corporotomy, tubing comes straight down and out through tunica, away from Crux, no compression of tubing during inflation, no issues.

This is why they sometimes have to use more rte's depending on model, and depth of crux.

Picture would be worth a thousand words here.
Implanted with AMS 700 lgx, 2021.
30's
UK

AST2123
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:54 am

Re: New AMS 700 LGX - Growth Potential

Postby AST2123 » Thu Sep 30, 2021 6:01 am

I agree with LRB.
RTE is a solution by all IPP manufacturers for the deep crux, and its usage is minimal due to the reasons mentioned in the nbci study.
Studies vs Facts: Are there any IPP men (with RTEs) who complain about less rigidity due to RTE? This study is done on Titan, which has the most rigid implants: if it is applied to AMS LGX, which is supposed to be the least rigid compared to Titan and CX, what would be the outcome? It will show way more deflection than Titan. The fact is, even with the negative effects of the RTE, the implant is still more rigid than the natural erection.
Finally Bionic
52y old. RP Oct. 2017. Pills didn't work. Trimix failed after a couple of times. Have inguinal hernia repair on both sides. Implanted AMS CX, 21 cm+1 cm RTE, by Dr. Kai Li at KP, VA, Jan. 2021. New username FinallyBionic

Childrenofthewild
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 9:20 am

Re: New AMS 700 LGX - Growth Potential

Postby Childrenofthewild » Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:17 am

Txagq8 wrote:Westwood: I come bearing tidings of what might be great joy. You know, good news. Let me caveat that by saying I’m not a doctor. I don’t play one on TV. But based upon your implant, you have the potential to get what you want and then some.

I’m not going to go thru the whole spiel I did on a similar thread, but maybe the Readet’s Digest condensed version will help.

Your penis is in two parts. The front half which is visible, the back half behind the pubic bone which isn’t.

It varies based on anatomy but most guys exhibit something between a 2/3-1/3 split and a 3/4-1/4 split.

In your case, let’s figure conservatively. 2/3 of ypur dick is visible snd 1/3 is hidden back behind the pubic bone.

You’ve got 19 cm of implant installed. That works out to 12.7 cm visible, 6.3 cm behind the pubic bone.

That gives you exactly 5 inches of visible penis. But it gets better. Your implant didn’t go all the way to the end of the penis. There is somewhere between 1/2 and 3/4 inch in front of the end of the implant.

Therefore, by the time you really finish healing up good, and can really pump that thing way up, you have no reason to expect anything less than about 5 1/2 inches.

Yeah, there can be some variation in anatomy and you might have an incredibly deep crus, resulting in less visible penis. But I wouldn’t bet money on it.I would bet money that a 18+1 cm
LGX delivers 5 1/2 inches.


Hello my friend if ur math is correct and I assume it is ,my orijinal size before 15.2 cm
And my surgeon did 16 +0.5 rte rigicon A10x.Now its been 3 weeks and I didnt started cyling.
Flaccid is around 12 cm and still healing but my question if my surgeon able to do 18 cm
And maybe some rte is this a profit thing cuz I see some other guys same length as me but they Got 18 +rte implants and that worries me a lot

Txagq8
Posts: 885
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Re: New AMS 700 LGX - Growth Potential

Postby Txagq8 » Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:23 am

Hey COTW:

Go check out my post to you on your other thread.

Yes, I think you have reason to worry. After you have your manhood equipment cut on, every guy worries. It’s normal to worry.

There are a lot of variables and anatomical issues in play here. So worry, but do not make yourself sick with worry or become frantic.

Ask the doctor these questions during follow-up care.
Age 68. Physically fit educated red neck in Texas. Very married. 23 cm (18+5) of LGX installed by Dr. Bryan Kansas 12/31/2019. I fought the ED and my wife & I won. I’m either full of shit or sound advice. You decide which.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 444 guests