Coloplast v AMS

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
TwoStep
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:22 pm

Re: Coloplast v AMS

Postby TwoStep » Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:33 pm

Removed wrong info
Last edited by TwoStep on Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:24 am, edited 2 times in total.

TwoStep
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:22 pm

Re: Coloplast v AMS

Postby TwoStep » Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:21 am

I’m going to add something positive/optimistic for once. There was discussion that the study inadvertently showed poor survival of the prostheses:
merrix wrote:
newbie443 wrote:
Merrix, I did not see not see anything in the 2 links you posted about the poor longevity of the LGX. The first link was about length and I found no information on longevity. The second link had no mention of the LGX and while giving a slight advantage in longevity to the CX over the Titan there were only 138 cases studied. That seems pretty small number to me to draw a conclusion.


Maybe you didn't read open-mindedly enough..!

I'll quote from the abstract from the link:
Mean time between implants was earlier for LGX (29 months) than CX (39 months) and Titan (48 months) patients (p<0.001).


But reading the abstract again it says:
We queried American Medical Systems and Coloplast Patient Information Form databases to identify patients who underwent IPP placement and replacement between 2004-2013.


So they’re conditioning on having had initial surgery (t1) and revision (t2) within a 9-year period. But for 0<t1<t2<9 years the average length of time from t1 to t2 is 3 years so the 29,39,48 months are not surprising when searching with this criterion (and the actual average lifespan may be longer).


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 134 guests