biobob wrote:1380 with no disrespect; you are looking at bad data. Like many other Franktalkers I have spent days studying this site as well as current medical data from reputable sources. Based on what I see unfortunately the European experience is not a good as the results for a high-volume US surgeon with a 3-piece implant; which seems to be greater than 90% satisfaction. It seems in the last few years the reported infection rate has decreased and the main concern about loss of length has been better addressed, with many posters report a recovery of some or all of lost length.
You reference to HBS 2007?
I find only the Harvard Business school 2007 annual report "a multidisciplinary program dedicated to innovative thinking in the healthcare industry." which may have been cutting edge in 2007 is surely not relevant at this point. It also would seem by reading FrankTalk that the use of 3 component implant in the US is over 95%, however this articles from NIH may provide a more recent overview of the current US experience https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575569/ and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958974/
I also think based on my 35-year personal experience in healthcare if the patient thinks a procedure will fail, it is more likely that will fail. Like some of the other posters have said; it doesn't seem like an implant is the best path for you.
Thanks for the advice. Most here dont even know how upset and terrified I feel. It was a Dr that prescribed me Finasteride and other Dr saying I had nothing wrong until finally I did a doppler to reveal what I have due tu adrogen deprivation. I consider implant if it can last more than 20 years without failing or caused infection. I dont want things to get worst. I was looking into the PotencyFlow from implantica and this should be the future of ED, honestly. Maybe Ill consider implant soon, but I think way too much due to the loss of confidence in science after my issue with FDA approves medication. Im really sorry Im just so devastated