Who initially had an LGX and later got implanted with a CX when it came time for revision? Interested in reading your experience with that and whether you preferred the LGX or the CX more.
I more than likely need a revision as my LGX cylinders are now buckling after very few thrusts into my partner, who happens to be naturally tight and contracts even more when orgasming.
Who here has had a revision from an AMS LGX to CX?
-
Blankloads69
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2021 3:13 pm
Who here has had a revision from an AMS LGX to CX?
Bio: 33-year-old prior sufferer of organic ED.
Procedures:
Infrapubic method
(2/22): AMS 700LGX 15cm + 5cm rte. 65ml res.
(9/23): AMS 700CX 18cm + 4cm rte. 75ml res.
Implant Specialists: Dr Jeffrey Loh-Doyle and Dr Stuart Boyd at Keck USC
Procedures:
Infrapubic method
(2/22): AMS 700LGX 15cm + 5cm rte. 65ml res.
(9/23): AMS 700CX 18cm + 4cm rte. 75ml res.
Implant Specialists: Dr Jeffrey Loh-Doyle and Dr Stuart Boyd at Keck USC
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: nuance and 133 guests
