Mark1974 wrote:The corporotomy made for a malleable is bigger, but it's possible that more residual cavernosal tissue remains because it isn't constantly being compressed by the expansion of hydraulic cylindersFlexwheeler wrote:thedriver wrote:Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years
A brother made a thread about the Rigicon malleable. He was not happy at all because of concealment issues. Even after a year in On the other hand he posted a pic of his penis and it was not thin at all.
If you add "rigicon" in the search button you will come across the thread.
He probably also had 13mm rods, but I wouldn't go beyond 11mm because of erosion issues and may even go 10. If girth kills me psychologically and makes me totally unacceptable to women I will use funds reserved for retirement to get Uro or Phallo-fill, but I hate to do it
And, yes, concealment is an issue with any malleable, even a Rigicon. But concealment is somewhat of an issue with a TItan as well
That is a lot of filler material to get. This is only my opinion. The pics I've seen of dicks with a lot of filler did not look natural at all in my opinion. Just because you can do something does not make that "thing" a wise choice.
Since so many men are afraid of being discovered of having an implant. Why get a constant erection dick that doesn't look normal? That logic totally escapes me.
