wolfpacker wrote:Rufian wrote:JohnHC wrote:
Oh I'm not swayed by 1/2 inch here or there. I just prefer the inflatable because of it being more natural looking. I don't like the looks of a malleable, no offense. When I travel for work I like to use the pools, spas, or hot tubs and well at my age I'd prefer not to be the creepy old guy sporting a boner out there. Plus the greater risk of it wearing through the skin, whether because of misuse, having the wrong size or whatever doesn't look to be very appealing. I know some is misinformation but I've seen the pictures of it happening and have never heard of that issue with the inflatables. If something happens with the inflatable that isn't an infection, you can leave it be, but if the malleable bendy part breaks or it wears through there's no option but surgery to remove it then you really are a wet noodle, with the inflatable there is some firmness due to the cylinders, not ideal but it's there. But again they make perfect sense for some people, but for me not yet at least.
You played yourself then, the inflatable technology is not here yet which is why failures happen
the malleable can be concealed, but may harder with some clothes, price to pay for a working penis that wont fail like your did
You have weight whats important to you, using pools or spas or having a working penis
What I noticed is that if the inflatable fails in one patients, more than likely it will fail a second and third time and son, because the failure probably has more to with their anatomy itself
Inflatable: more likely for device to fail. Device can be replaced
Malleable: more likely to cause your tissue to fail. Tissue cannot be replaced
that's a big cope lol
your penis had already failed you before any implants (otherwise why get one?) and once implant went it, whether inflatable or malleable, your cavernosa was destroyed with no chances of going back
in both cases you were screwed from the start