Malleables revisited

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Mark1974
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 5:16 pm
Location: Central Illinois

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby Mark1974 » Mon Nov 04, 2024 9:31 pm

easymoney wrote:I too have a MPP but I had one implanted ..then cut open 30 days later ..then 12 months later replaced with a longer one. I have yet to get my sensitivity back at 5 months unable to climax no matter what ..I too hope it resolves itself over time


5 months no orgasm...

I honestly don't mind losing some size, but this kind of thing scares me
Born 6/15/74. I have substantial venous leak with fairly severe hour-glassing, but no hard plaques. My urologist is sexual health expert Dr. Laurence Levine who performed a Doppler Ultrasound and diagnosed me with VL in 2020. I also have mild BPH

fucked0ne
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:47 pm

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby fucked0ne » Tue Nov 05, 2024 5:24 am

LastHope wrote:
Discovernew wrote:
LastHope wrote:Yes, good point. Subsequent revisions present a unique challenge due to the presence of biofilms.

IPP infection rate ranges:
0.46% to 2.00% for virgin cases
10.0% to 13.3% for revisions cases

A different study that stratifies by number of prior IPP surgeries:
1 - 6.8%
2 - 18.2%
3 - 33.3%
4 - 50.0%
5 - 100%

The numbers might be skewed by poorer outcomes from low-volume centers. Nevertheless, there is a trend.

Source:
Hebert KJ, Kohler TS.
Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities.
World J Mens Health. 2019 Sep;37(3):276-287. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.180123


These numbers really make me consider a Malleable if my current IPP fails (i am newly implanted so i really hope it doesn't happen anytime soon)


One limitation of that study is its small revision sample size. Additionally, Mayo Clinic may receive some of the most complex revision cases referred from low-volume centers across the nation, which introduces a potential selection bias that could inflate the infection rates.

The key takeaway here seems to be the upward trend in infection risk with each revision.

Dr. Clavell has done a revision on a patient who was on his 10th implant, and he was doing well. Surgeon selection and the baseline health of the patient is also a factor.


LastHope, where did you hear this from Clavell? YouTube? If so, do you remember the name of the video?
40. Implanted July 5, 2024, by Dr. Andrew Kramer, Urology Associates of Cape Cod. AMS LGX, 21cm cylinders + 2cm RTEs. Idiopathic erectile dysfunction following bacterial infection. Tried pulse waves, Cialis, even spinal injections. Nada.

User avatar
thedriver
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:56 am

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby thedriver » Tue Nov 05, 2024 6:03 am

fucked0ne wrote:
thedriver wrote:This all has been gone over many times through out the forums, IPP compared to MPP, concealability, cost, recovery time, differences in size, you name it. All I can really say about it is The wifey and I are more then happy with the Genesis. To those that don't know I had 4 IPP's before going to the MPP, It was the quickest recovery of all the surgeries, least painful, it was a day surgery, I lost no length, lost about a 1/2 in girth, just makes it easier for her to deepthroat it, we have tried and tested all the positions and then some.


thedriver, having had four revisions, did you happen to lose any length with any of your revision surgeries?


Length remained the same thro out all of the surgeries, lost about a 1/2 inch in girth going from the IPP to the MPP.
After 4 Titan IPP failures within 4 years I finally wised up and went to the Malleable Genesis 23cm- 13mm implanted 2-1-24 and no regrets so far.
For those that are asking, I'm going to change the wifeys avatar weekly.

Watcher1960
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2024 4:32 pm

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby Watcher1960 » Tue Nov 05, 2024 8:03 am

Peno-scrotal. Bends but bounces right back.

LastHope
Posts: 724
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:26 am

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby LastHope » Tue Nov 05, 2024 9:06 am

fucked0ne wrote:
LastHope wrote:
Discovernew wrote:
These numbers really make me consider a Malleable if my current IPP fails (i am newly implanted so i really hope it doesn't happen anytime soon)


One limitation of that study is its small revision sample size. Additionally, Mayo Clinic may receive some of the most complex revision cases referred from low-volume centers across the nation, which introduces a potential selection bias that could inflate the infection rates.

The key takeaway here seems to be the upward trend in infection risk with each revision.

Dr. Clavell has done a revision on a patient who was on his 10th implant, and he was doing well. Surgeon selection and the baseline health of the patient is also a factor.


LastHope, where did you hear this from Clavell? YouTube? If so, do you remember the name of the video?


Hi F1, yes, here's the video where Dr. Clavell mentioned about the 10th revision around 47.10 minutes...

Channel: Dr. Susie Gronski & Team
Penis implant surgery for erectile dysfunction
https://youtu.be/PbZ_KeZExes?si=-xQLjJDMqa1N5MYz

Discovernew
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2023 5:14 pm

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby Discovernew » Tue Nov 05, 2024 10:46 am

LastHope wrote:
fucked0ne wrote:
LastHope wrote:
One limitation of that study is its small revision sample size. Additionally, Mayo Clinic may receive some of the most complex revision cases referred from low-volume centers across the nation, which introduces a potential selection bias that could inflate the infection rates.

The key takeaway here seems to be the upward trend in infection risk with each revision.

Dr. Clavell has done a revision on a patient who was on his 10th implant, and he was doing well. Surgeon selection and the baseline health of the patient is also a factor.


LastHope, where did you hear this from Clavell? YouTube? If so, do you remember the name of the video?


Hi F1, yes, here's the video where Dr. Clavell mentioned about the 10th revision around 47.10 minutes...

Channel: Dr. Susie Gronski & Team
Penis implant surgery for erectile dysfunction
https://youtu.be/PbZ_KeZExes?si=-xQLjJDMqa1N5MYz


The fact that anyone in the world can have 10 revisions tells me that the published statistics about implant failure don't add up.
Implanted October 11, 2024, Dr Karaman. Infla10 AX 20cm +1cm RTE.
My Implant Journal - Click Here

ED about 14 years. Pills worked for 12 years, later worked 50%. Tried almost everything, nothing worked: Shockwave-Testosterone-PRP-Stem Cells-Botox, Etc

easymoney
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue May 09, 2023 10:28 am
Location: West Coast Fl.

Re: Malleables revisited

Postby easymoney » Tue Nov 05, 2024 11:11 am

I'd like to shake the hand of a man who would let a dr. operate on his penis 10 times .. 3 is enough for me .. if mine fails considering throwing in the towel and calling it quits.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dan_bionic, Gatorman97, Google [Bot], Plumes, Ray Johnson, stmcknig and 450 guests