Article on infra pubic vs scrotal

[rahod1]

Go to Dr Karpman's web site. He has done both, but prefers infra pubic. I suggest you view his instructional video on the procedure.....awesome work. To me the only downside is *possible* dorsal nerve damage, which he addresses in the video.
Recovery with this procedure appears to be far superior to scrotal.....if done by a PRO like Karpman.
Disclosure...I don't have an implant (injecting with success), but if I ever require one Karpman is *my man*.

Articles by Karpman:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/au/2012/520180/


http://www.jurology.com/article/S0022-5347(15)01397-X/fulltext#sec4

Pundits have lauded and criticized the nuances of penoscrotal (PS) and infrapubic (IP) approaches for IPP surgery despite the fact that there has never been a prospective comparison of both techniques. Criticisms such as dorsal nerve injury and high riding pumps for IP approach and difficulty with reservoir placement with PS approach are based on dogma and not science.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows no increased risk of dorsal nerve injury or high riding pumps requiring surgical revision in IP patients. Penoscrotal patients had a higher rate of requiring separate surgical incision for reservoir placement, but risk of herniation was not higher in PS patients.

[alibaba]

Everybody says he is a nice guy. I agree healing seem faster but issues are limitless when a quack is doing it. Some revision experts say it only works out fine in an uncomplicated implant and if the doctor has a clue what the hell he is doing. No scar tissue, no peronies, no issues other than E.D.