For young guys in their 20s who are recommended an implant, here’s an example from the US FDA archives that's very encouraging.
AMS 650 malleable (1996–2009) implanted in 1999 when he was 27 years old. The rods required a revision only after 24 years of use, when he turned 51!
Malleables: how to tell when it’s time for a revision?
-
LastHope
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:26 am
Re: Malleables: how to tell when it’s time for a revision?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
40, 1/25 - Coloplast Genesis malleable by Dr. Christine.
To uncircumcised considering MPP:
Subcoronal approach --> high risk of post-op paraphimosis and lifelong preputial edema. Recommend discussing penoscrotal approach.
To uncircumcised considering MPP:
Subcoronal approach --> high risk of post-op paraphimosis and lifelong preputial edema. Recommend discussing penoscrotal approach.
-
tooyoung
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:46 pm
Re: Malleables: how to tell when it’s time for a revision?
LastHope wrote:For young guys in their 20s who are recommended an implant, here’s an example from the US FDA archives that's very encouraging.
AMS 650 malleable (1996–2009) implanted in 1999 when he was 27 years old. The rods required a revision only after 24 years of use, when he turned 51!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
LastHope
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:26 am
Re: Malleables: how to tell when it’s time for a revision?
You're welcome, TooYoung.
I got one more for you
This time it's AMS Dura 2 malleable: 20 years of service!
I got one more for you
This time it's AMS Dura 2 malleable: 20 years of service!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
40, 1/25 - Coloplast Genesis malleable by Dr. Christine.
To uncircumcised considering MPP:
Subcoronal approach --> high risk of post-op paraphimosis and lifelong preputial edema. Recommend discussing penoscrotal approach.
To uncircumcised considering MPP:
Subcoronal approach --> high risk of post-op paraphimosis and lifelong preputial edema. Recommend discussing penoscrotal approach.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: amazonbot, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mijudac79 and 13 guests
