Wooody wrote:JohnnyBorg wrote:LastHope wrote:My surgeon admitted (after the surgery

) that he intentionally downsized my rods by 1 cm to reduce the biologically plausible higher risk of erosion with rod implants.
Interestingly, I haven’t noticed any loss in length. My pre-op SPL (stretched penile length) is the same as my post-op flaccid length. How that’s possible? I don’t know....but I still tell my bros that I might have lost 1 cm. I just don't want my placebo effects or measurement errors to influence others in their decision making.
Yep, that’s right in line with the expectations Hakky sets in his YouTube video about malleables. I’m totally cool with a 1 cm reduction if it helps mitigate erosion risks.
LastHope - I forgot from your previous posts, do you still get some engorgement with your Genesis? Is there a difference in girth or length from when you’re aroused vs unaroused? This is something I’m curious about with the MPP’s - how different they look and/or feel when you’re aroused vs just going about your day.
What about girth? A major reason I ruled out an MPP is because I read and confirmed with Drs that I wouldn't come close to maintaining my girth. I was, and still am now, 6" girth from base to tip and women have always enjoyed that more than my length. MPP rods don't seem to be offered in thick sizes, no?
Hey Wooody. Yeah I feel like anecdotally I’ve heard pmixed things on girth with an MPP. From what I’ve researched, IPP is the safest bet to maintain or even gain back some girth.
But with that said, I think there are a quite a few malleable guys here who report no major hit to girth or don’t notice if they’ve lost any. I think The Driver indicated maybe that he might’ve lost a small amount of girth (I could be mistaken, I don’t want to misquote) but if you’ve read his posts, he’s a very happy dude with his malleable!
Duke Cicero has had his Genesis for a bit now and reported that he hasn’t noticed a difference in his girth pre / post implant.
I think Mbambo might have mentioned he felt he has MORE girth with the Rigi10 he was implanted with. That could make sense too, since the Rigi10 has the most options in terms of rod width for the MPPs.
But I don’t think this is always the case, based on other things I’ve read in passing online.
So from what have gathered - maintaining girth with MPP is more variable patient to patient, whereas with the IPPs I feel like I almost ALWAYS have read girth is maintained (or in some cases, slight gains) assuming the patient was sized correctly.
It’s an oversimplification, but I kind of think of it as sort of the opposite risk as what im weighing out with the IPP. With the IPP, I think the “roll of the dice” for me is that I could gain girth, but might need more revisions. With the MPP, I might not need more revisions, but could actually potentially lose a little girth or length. Those are a couple potential trade offs with either approach.
It definitely makes sense why you’d choose the IPP over MPP if maintaining your girth was an important factor for you. It’s something that’s definitely on my mind and why I haven’t fully decided yet what path to take.
Diagnosed with venous leak after having ED majority of my life. Grateful to have some answers, and considering both MPP and IPP as options.