Gt1956 wrote:LastHope wrote:sambalamba wrote:Fantastic. What do these payments mean? Are they research grants (marketing donations) or some other type of payments such as warranty coverage payments or something else?
Duke said it well!
I've attached some examples from the "compensated for" sections in the dataset.
I think it's a good tool for:
1) Fishing out conflicts of interest on why a specific physician may be excessively biased towards a specific device/drug brand.
2) It's not uncommon for certain doctors highly compensated by Novo Nordisk, for example, to excessively tweet about that new Novo drug, mostly prescribe that drug, and rave about it on their YouTube channel.
3) Seeking out brand specific highly compensated physicians for product expertise. For example, a personal consult I had with a 'Coloplast Only' compensated expert was unable to answer my questions about the Boston Scientific Tactra malleable prosthesis competently. When I sought out the Boston Scientific compensated expert, she was able to explain exactly what I was asking about!
Its a shame at how prolific so called "influencers" have become. Your research is coming on the heels of news that some celebrities were highly compensated to endorse presidential candidates.
If you can't trust the motives of your dr? What is our medical system coming to? But I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Dr Kramer was rumored to pitch Titans in his YouTube days. He seemed to always comment on the surgery on how great the Titan was.
Looking at Rigicon's data, I already see Dr. Kramer at #2 on the list. It's low budget now with the Rigicon malleables, but when the IPP hits the US market, some of these guys are going to be the influencers.